[CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation

[Alan Greenberg]

Support (wearing my DT-F hat). Alan

At 07/03/2016 06:44 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:

>Agree absolutely!  Count me in
>On 7 Mar 2016 18:05, "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" 
><<mailto:ocl at gih.com>ocl at gih.com> wrote:
>+1 I also support - and if I may add, I attended 
>the session today and was very surprised that 
>the stage was just populated by ICANN Staff. I 
>have concerns that this kind of fumble is 
>exactly the kind of thing that breeds lack of 
>trust so I am pleased to see the proposal Jonathan has shared with us.
>Kindest regards,
>
>Olivier
>
>On 07/03/2016 17:09, Greg Shatan wrote:
>>I support this as well.
>>
>>Greg
>>
>>On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Lindeberg, 
>>Elise <<mailto:elise.lindeberg at nkom.no>elise.lindeberg at nkom.no> wrote:
>>
>>Also in support !
>>
>>
>>
>>Elise
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Elise Lindeberg
>>
>>Senior Legal Adviser
>>
>>Norwegian GAC representative
>>
>>Norwegian Communications Authority
>>
>>Dir. <tel:%2B47%2022%20824607>+47 22 824607 
>>Mob. <tel:%2B47%2090190947>+47 90190947
>>
>><mailto:ekl at nkom.no>ekl at nkom.no
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Fra: 
>><mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org 
>>[mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] PÃ¥ vegne av Jian C. Chang
>>Sendt: 7. mars 2016 17:06
>>Til: Eduardo Diaz; 
>><mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>jrobinson at afilias.info; cwg-stewardship
>>Emne: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation
>>
>>
>>
>>Agree and support Jonathan's proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>>+1 to Mathew, not DT lead too, but will be 
>>happy to participate in the task force if necessary.
>>
>>
>>
>>Jian Chang
>>
>>KNET
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>From: <mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>Eduardo Diaz
>>
>>Date: 2016-03-07 23:56
>>
>>To: <mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>jrobinson; 
>><mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>cwg-stewardship
>>
>>Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Implementation
>>
>>I do support this proposal.
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks for being so attentive to these details.
>>
>>
>>
>>-ed
>>
>>On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM Jonathan 
>>Robinson <<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:
>>
>>All,
>>
>>
>>
>>Lise and I today attended the session entitled:
>>
>>
>>
>><https://meetings.icann.org/en/marrakech55/schedule/mon-iana-stewardship-implementation>https://meetings.icann.org/en/marrakech55/schedule/mon-iana-stewardship-implementation
>>
>>
>>
>>It became clear during the course of the 
>>session that material new details on the 
>>implementation of the CWG Stewardship proposal 
>>were being released for the first time.
>>
>>
>>
>>This raises two issues:
>>
>>
>>
>>1.      Process – How do we ensure that ICANN 
>>implementation staff do not get out of synchronisation with the CWG?
>>
>>2.      Substance – Do we agree with the 
>>details presented in the session today?
>>
>>
>>
>>Both Lise and I stood up and made points to 
>>this effect during the meeting as did some of 
>>the CWG Stewardship Members / Participants.
>>
>>We also spoke with Akram & Trang afterwards. It 
>>does seem that this was an inadvertent 
>>oversight driven by a desire and need to make progress.
>>
>>
>>
>>However, it is also evident that there is a 
>>need for the ICANN staff implementation team to 
>>have more rapid or agile reference to the CWG, 
>>in addition to our bi-weekly updates / meetings.
>>
>>
>>
>>Therefore, in order to address this need, the 
>>co-chairs propose to form an implementation 
>>oversight task force comprising the CWG 
>>co-chairs and the DT leads. The outcomes will 
>>come back to the CWG in any case but we believe 
>>that we need a capability to track the 
>>implementation work as closely as possible and as it evolves.
>>
>>
>>
>>Please can we have any comments or concerns 
>>with this proposal as soon as possible.
>>
>>
>>
>>Thank-you,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Lise and Jonathan
>>
>>Co-Chairs, CWG Stewardship
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>><mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>><mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>
>><mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
><mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160307/26738663/attachment-0001.html>