[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] Naming Function Agreement

[Trang Nguyen]

All,

Attached is an updated table of issues, with the topic of specific reference to Section 1.3 of the 2005 GAC Principles added for discussion.

Best,

Trang

From: <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org<mailto:trang.nguyen at icann.org>>
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 8:48 PM
To: "CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>" <CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] Naming Function Agreement

All,

Forwarding email from Sidley regarding the the Naming Function Agreement for your review.

Best,

Trang

From: <cwg-client-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-client-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of "Hofheimer, Joshua T." <jhofheimer at sidley.com<mailto:jhofheimer at sidley.com>>
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 8:32 PM
To: Client <cwg-client at icann.org<mailto:cwg-client at icann.org>>, "jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>" <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>, 'Lise Fuhr' <lise.fuhr at difo.dk<mailto:lise.fuhr at difo.dk>>
Subject: [client com] Naming Function Agreement

Dear Client Committee,

Attached please find a revised draft of the Naming Function Agreement, marked against the version ICANN put out for public comment.  This draft reflects the negotiation of various items between ICANN and Sidley, as well as ICANN's response to the comments provided previously by Paul Kane, Becky Burr and other CWG participants.  ICANN has prepared an chart reflecting a number of items for which it is seeking confirmation from the CWG Client Committee that the particular item may be considered closed out.  Although the chart appears lengthy, that is merely because it contains the historical context of discussion for each item.   ICANN plans to review these items on the call tomorrow, and for our part, Sidley has no further edits to request if the CWG is satisfied with ICANN's proposed handling of the matters on the chart.

Thank you,
Josh

JOSHUA T. HOFHEIMER
Partner

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
+1 650 565 7561 (PA direct)
+1 213 896 6061 (LA direct)
+1 323 708 2405 (Cell)
jhofheimer at sidley.com<mailto:jhofheimer at sidley.com>
www.sidley.com<http://www.sidley.com>
[SIDLEY]





****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160901/2b73692e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Names Chart_ICANN_ICANN 1Sep.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 50744 bytes
Desc: Names Chart_ICANN_ICANN 1Sep.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160901/2b73692e/NamesChart_ICANN_ICANN1Sep-0001.docx>