[CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Jonathan,

I do not understand the argument of Seun that all of the sudden he becomes
smeared supporter of Intellectual property.

I do not understand that nor the support of Chuck.

I do not think that we need additional person at all

Kavouss


2016-09-10 16:51 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>:

> Seun,
>
>
>
> Please note that the drafting of the letter of appointment (as per the
> action you refer to) does not in any way pre-suppose the names of the
> actual appointees.
>
>
>
> As the call records will show, I put a strawman out for the IANA IPR Group
> as the initial appointees for the CCG reps; 2 x Co-chairs (of CWG) plus
> Greg Shatan (as CCG Co-Chair).
>
>
>
> Any other suggestions / proposals are clearly very welcome.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
> *Sent:* 10 September 2016 13:51
> *To:* Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>; Brenda Brewer <
> brenda.brewer at icann.org>
> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
>
>
>
> Seun,
>
>
>
> Note that it was suggested that Greg Shatan serve as one of the interim
> CCG members; if we do that, it clearly would satisfy your recommendation
> that “a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
> constituency”.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> bounces at icann.org <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Seun
> Ojedeji
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:46 AM
> *To:* Brenda Brewer
> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
>
>
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org> wrote:
> > Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
> > Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until
> a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.
> >
>
> SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much
> responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot
> of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are
> formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like
> to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim
> instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the
> intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of
> strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make
> decisions based on their approval.
>
> > ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a
> letter of appointment of CCG reps.
> >
>
> SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply
> that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case,
> I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
> constituency.
>
> On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no
> possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members.
>
> Regards
>
> > 5. AOB
> >
> > IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
> >
> > ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
> >
> > Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160910/b62322be/attachment-0001.html>