[CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Chuck
I did not say that .
If you or we have decided that two seats be filled by two co-chairs, I have
no problem at all.
For the third one ,we need to discuss to see if there is only one self
candidate for one seat that tacit élection ruiles apply .If it is more than
one and we need to decide.
By the way people should not pretend that they do not uinderstand me.
Regards
KAVOUSS

2016-09-12 3:23 GMT+02:00 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>:

> I don’t understand Kavouss.  Are you suggesting that the Names Community
> should not fill all three seats on the CCG?
>
>
>
> Also, what did I say that conveys my support of anything in my message
> below?  I simply reported what happened in the meeting and associated it to
> Seun’s suggestion.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kavouss Arasteh
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 10, 2016 3:45 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Robinson; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
>
>
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I do not understand the argument of Seun that all of the sudden he becomes
> smeared supporter of Intellectual property.
>
> I do not understand that nor the support of Chuck.
>
> I do not think that we need additional person at all
>
> Kavouss
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-09-10 16:51 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>:
>
> Seun,
>
>
>
> Please note that the drafting of the letter of appointment (as per the
> action you refer to) does not in any way pre-suppose the names of the
> actual appointees.
>
>
>
> As the call records will show, I put a strawman out for the IANA IPR Group
> as the initial appointees for the CCG reps; 2 x Co-chairs (of CWG) plus
> Greg Shatan (as CCG Co-Chair).
>
>
>
> Any other suggestions / proposals are clearly very welcome.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
> *Sent:* 10 September 2016 13:51
> *To:* Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>; Brenda Brewer <
> brenda.brewer at icann.org>
> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
>
>
>
> Seun,
>
>
>
> Note that it was suggested that Greg Shatan serve as one of the interim
> CCG members; if we do that, it clearly would satisfy your recommendation
> that “a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
> constituency”.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
> bounces at icann.org <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Seun
> Ojedeji
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:46 AM
> *To:* Brenda Brewer
> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
>
>
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org> wrote:
> > Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
> > Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until
> a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.
> >
>
> SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much
> responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot
> of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are
> formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like
> to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim
> instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the
> intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of
> strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make
> decisions based on their approval.
>
> > ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a
> letter of appointment of CCG reps.
> >
>
> SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply
> that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case,
> I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
> constituency.
>
> On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no
> possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members.
>
> Regards
>
> > 5. AOB
> >
> > IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
> >
> > ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
> >
> > Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160912/0daffc4c/attachment.html>