[Discussion-igo-rc] Slides and Agenda for the GAC-GNSO Facilitated Dialogue on IGO Protections

[Chris Disspain]

Indeed Phil. An excellent example of why reserving the IGO acronyms would not be feasible. There are many others...


Cheers,

Chris

> On 12 Mar 2017, at 18:20, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
> 
> Bruce:
> 
> As you used the acronym PAM in the slides, I thought members of the discussion group would find this of relevant interest (PAM is a registered trademark for a very popular non-stick cooking spray in the United States) --
> 
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAM_(cooking_oil)   
> 
> Best, Philip
> 
> 
> 
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
> 
> Virtualaw LLC
> 
> 1155 F Street, NW
> 
> Suite 1050
> 
> Washington, DC 20004
> 
> 202-559-8597/Direct
> 
> 202-559-8750/Fax
> 
> 202-255-6172/cell
> 
> 
> 
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: discussion-igo-rc-bounces at icann.org [discussion-igo-rc-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Bruce Tonkin [Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au]
> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 8:43 AM
> To: discussion-igo-rc at icann.org
> Subject: [Discussion-igo-rc] Slides and Agenda for the GAC-GNSO Facilitated Dialogue on IGO Protections
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> It has taken me a whole to think about how best to facilitate a discussion on this complex topic.
> 
> Attached are some slides that set context and also a flow for discussion.
> 
> I propose to break the discussion into 4 phases.   We may not have time to cover all the phases.
> 
> The phases are:
> 
> (1) Reservation - clarify current provisions around reservation of names, and also get input from both GAC and GNSO on this topic
> 
> (2) Notice - clarify the positions of the GNSO and GAC on the form and duration of notice when an IGO acronym  is registered
> 
> (3) Dispute resolution - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations.    This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far
> 
> (4) Appeals - this is the subject of a current PDP and an initial report has been published with Draft recommendations.    This will allow the PDP to take input from the GAC and the working party members to explain how they have taken the GAC advice into account so far.
> 
> I will be available at 6pm outside the meeting room for anyone that wants to get together and run through the agenda.
> 
> The style will be similar to the style of the session on Saturday morning.   On each topic I will ask the GAC and GNSO delegations to comment, and may suggest some ideas for resolving the conflict.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion-igo-rc mailing list
> Discussion-igo-rc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion-igo-rc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/discussion-igo-rc/attachments/20170312/eb089704/attachment.html>