[SLE Team] Names SLEs proposals - next steps

Paul M Kane - CWG paul.kane-cwg at icb.co.uk
Thu Aug 4 12:31:18 UTC 2016


Can we do a poll for Monday or a day next week - life is super hectic at the
moment with my day jobs.....

THanks

Paul

Quoting Nathalie Vergnolle <nathalie.vergnolle at icann.org>:

> Dear Jay, dear all,
> I'd be happy to send out a doodle poll to set up a follow-up call if the
> group would like to reconvene , maybe for this Friday, August 5th? 
> 
> Please confirm,
> Thank you,
> Nathalie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Daley [mailto:jay at nzrs.net.nz] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 3:48 PM
> To: Nathalie Vergnolle <nathalie.vergnolle at icann.org>
> Cc: dt1 at icann.org; Naela Sarras <naela.sarras at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [SLE Team] Names SLEs proposals - next steps
> 
> Hi Nathalie
> 
> I would very much prefer a call of the design team for us to discuss and
> agree a consensus position and I’m uncomfortable giving a view without
> doing so.  However, since I’m asked, this is my view below but there
> remains the possibility that one of my colleagues on DT-A raises an issue
> that I am currently unaware of and I agree with.
> 
> ===
> Recognising that:
> 
> 1.  The intent is to set targets that reasonably approximate current
> performance; and 2.  The difference between this level of specification and
> the previous NTIA specification is so large that there are many new areas
> being introduced; and 3.  The CSC will be able to address any outstanding
> areas as needed.
> 
> and with the one reservation that the negotiation of the RZMA was not
> conducted with any community input and so the figure of 72 hours has not been
> verified by the community as representing the current performance,
> 
> then I am happy to accept this as the final SLE targets.
> ====
> 
> Jay
> 
> > On 4/08/2016, at 5:44 AM, Nathalie Vergnolle <nathalie.vergnolle at icann.org>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Dear members of the Names SLEs work group,
> >  
> > The attached document reflects the various conversations that were held on
> the topic of Names SLEs:
> > ·        It lists all the measurements as defined by the work group in the
> report issued in September 2015
>
(https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-A+Service+Levels+Expectations?preview=/52891144/56135156/IANA%20Service%20Level%20Expectations%20-%20APPROVED.pdf
> )
> >  
> > ·        Column D reflects the discussions held in Istanbul in March 2015
> ( please note that the measurements discussed then were slightly different
> from the final measurements listed here, and mapping was left to staff's
> appreciation. Some values may have have been improperly mapped here.) 
> > Link to the Istanbul March 2015 document: 
> > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52891144/CWG-%20DT-A%
> > 20-%20SLE%20-%20for%20discussion%20in%20Istanbul%20-%20DRAFT.pdf
> >  
> > ·        Column E reflects the IANA proposal as per the document
> circulated by Kim Davies on 15-July16
>
(http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt1/attachments/20160715/fc7cd83b/PreliminarySLEData-0001.pdf
> )
> >  
> > ·        Column F reflects the discussions held on the DT-A call of
> 21-July-16 (links to the recordings can be found under the Meetings & Work
> Sessions section of the Implementation
> pagehttps://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation )
> >  
> > ·        Column G reflects the discussions held on the DT-A call of
> 01-Aug-16 (links to the recordings can be found under the Meetings & Work
> Sessions section of the Implementation
> pagehttps://www.icann.org/stewardship-implementation ).
> >  
> > ·        As requested by the group on August 1st, IANA has reviewed the
> latest proposals and provided feedback in the Notes section (column H).
> >  
> > Since this document was only circulated yesterday, and in order to give you
> more time to review, we have cancelled today’s call on Names SLEs.
> >  
> > Kindly asking all members of the Names SLEs work group to provide their
> feedback through the mailing list no later than Friday, August 5th. 
> >  
> > We plan to circulate this document to the CWG mailing list  no later than
> Monday, August 8th, so that final discussions can be held during the
> following CWG call scheduled on August 11th , with the hope to finalize a set
> of performance targets in time for the August 12th NTIA report.
> >  
> > Thank you for your collaboration,
> > Nathalie.
> > <SLA proposals 
> > 02Aug16.xlsx>_______________________________________________
> > dt1 mailing list
> > dt1 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> 
> 
> --
> Jay Daley
> Chief Executive
> NZRS Ltd
> desk: +64 4 931 6977
> mobile: +64 21 678840
> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dt1 mailing list
> dt1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dt1
> 
> 







More information about the dt1 mailing list