[SLE Team] Names SLEs proposals - next steps

[Paul M Kane - CWG]

Thanks Nathalie

A member of my staff has kindly highlighted in yellow (and numbered) the fields
that need to be completed.

If you/IANA would kindly use the footnote number to complete the information
needed - then we have a completed SLE.

My goal is to ensure that the full SLE (approved by CWG) is completed and has
threshold

It would be great if this could be completed today/over the weekend so we can
review on Monday before our call.

Have a good w/end.....

Paul

Quoting Nathalie Vergnolle <nathalie.vergnolle at icann.org>:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> "Time to return results for technical checks following submission of request
> via automated submission interface" is listed as R3, line 16 of the excel
> table.
> 
> "Time to return results for subsequent performance of technical checks during
> retesting due to earlier failed tests" is listed as R4, line 22 of the excel
> table.
> 
> Let us know if anything else is missing.
> Thanks,
> Nathalie
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dt1-bounces at icann.org [mailto:dt1-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul
> M Kane - CWG
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 5:39 AM
> To: Jay Daley <jay at nzrs.net.nz>
> Cc: Naela Sarras <naela.sarras at icann.org>; dt1 at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [SLE Team] Names SLEs proposals - next steps
> 
> I am trying to check we have captured every transaction.
> 
> Looking at our original (approved) document.... I see we have not addressed:
> 
> "Time to return results for technical checks following submission of request
> via automated submission interface"
> 
> Also 
> 
> "Time to return results for subsequent performance of technical checks during
> retesting due to earlier failed tests"
> 
> For completeness I attach the document the SLE and CWG group approved and
> would like someone to check correctly recorded the agreed positions. 
> 
> There are a small number of other areas yet to be addressed for our work to
> be completed.
> 
> Best
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IANA Service Level Expectations - AGREED WITH SLA PROPOSALS 05Aug16.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1177136 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt1/attachments/20160805/4b574c4f/IANAServiceLevelExpectations-AGREEDWITHSLAPROPOSALS05Aug16-0001.pdf>