[DTC CSC] DT-3 document

[Bart Boswinkel]

All
I'll upload both Document in pdf format,
Sugggest we start with the Google docs ( as underlying document) and then move to Donna's paper.
I will also upload template for insertion of proposed language into the proposal
Kind regards,
Bart

From: Staffan Jonson <staffan.jonson at iis.se<mailto:staffan.jonson at iis.se>>
Date: Friday 20 March 2015 16:27
To: Donna Austin <Donna.Austin at ariservices.com<mailto:Donna.Austin at ariservices.com>>, "dt3 at icann.org<mailto:dt3 at icann.org>" <dt3 at icann.org<mailto:dt3 at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [DTC CSC] DT-3 document

All
Re my changes in Google docs  yesterday:
I'll explain changes in the meeting.

In the meantime, Please find red letters added in Donnas paper and the Google doc document.
It is a way trying to map similarities between the two.

Se you soon


:)
Staffan

staffan.jonson at iis.se<mailto:staffan.jonson at iis.se>
+46 73 317 39 67




Från: dt3-bounces at icann.org<mailto:dt3-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:dt3-bounces at icann.org] För Donna Austin
Skickat: den 20 mars 2015 05:56
Till: dt3 at icann.org<mailto:dt3 at icann.org>
Ämne: [DTC CSC] DT-3 document

All

Attached is a document I've put together which is intended to reflect what we captured in our first attempt at responding to the questions posed in the scoping document. I've attempted to address the issues of overlap and duplication that resulted from that exercise.

I want to combine c) and d), but I haven't worked out how best to do that and would welcome input tomorrow.

There are some gaps in the table intended to reflect current contract requirement and what that would be post transition. I think it will be important for us to understand the work of the Design Team on SLAs/SLEs to understand where they fit, if at all, under the contractual requirements. It's not clear to me just at this point, but as the CSC will be responsible for reviewing and monitoring reports this will be important to understand.

I think much of Staffan's new additions had been incorporated to a large extent in the work that we had already covered, but I will wait until we hear from Staffan tomorrow to confirm this.

Given composition of the CSC will likely be the most contentious, I would like to have another discussion about this tomorrow.

I've also attached the document Chris Disspain sent to the CWG list yesterday. I have not taken this into account in considering the document I have put together, but I think there would be some value to go through that tomorrow and see if there is anything we would want to include.

Thanks

Donna


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dt3/attachments/20150320/9393cb37/attachment.html>