[DT-O] DT-O Meeting

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Sorry for the delay.. Here is my belated YES to the proposed way forward. .
On 27 Nov 2015 6:21 am, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:

> DT-O Team Members:
>
>
>
> I would like to be able to communicate to the full CWG the level of
> support from active DT-O members for the budget approach for PTI/IANA early
> next week.  So far, three out of four active DT-O members have responded
> affirmatively in support and I hope to hear from the fourth not later than
> this coming Monday. My intent if Lise and Jonathan agree, would be to ask
> CWG participants to review Xavier’s presentation and ask any questions on
> the CWG list before the next CWG call.  I have suggested to Jonathan and
> Lise that we allow a little time in the next CWG call for any final
> questions about the presentation and in particular the approach proposed by
> Xavier and staff and then ask if anyone has any objections to the approach.
>
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any concerns.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* dto-bounces at icann.org [mailto:dto-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2015 4:49 PM
> *To:* DT-O Mailing List (dto at icann.org)
> *Cc:* jonathan.robinson at afilias.info
> *Subject:* [DT-O] DT-O Meeting
>
>
>
> After the CWG meeting on Thursday, I came to the conclusion that there
> doesn’t appear to be a need for a DT-O meeting prior to the next CWG call.
> So unless someone else identifies a need, I suggest that we not schedule
> one.
>
>
>
> I had hoped that we would be able to get an initial sense of the full CWG
> in terms of the approach outlined by Xavier but, unfortunately there was
> not time for discussion.  I still think it would be helpful in the next CWG
> call to ask the full group if they are comfortable with the approach
> outlined by Xavier as well as whether anyone sees a problem with a
> minimalist approach; after that we can determine whether there is a need
> for any further DT-O calls.
>
>
>
> I would like all of you to respond to this question:  Do you agree that it
> makes sense for staff to move forward with the approach that Xavier laid
> out in our DT-O meeting this past Wednesday and in the CWG call yesterday?
> That would mean that they could go ahead and proceed in planning as
> intended, i.e., the next step for staff (Trang and Xavier, with all the
> other contributing budget owners) to put together a draft operating plan
> and budget for PTI/IANA as outlined in the presentation.
>
>
>
> Please respond yes or no to this question.  If ‘no’, please explain why so
> I can determine what other steps may need to be taken.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.  Have a good weekend.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> dto mailing list
> dto at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/dto
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/dto/attachments/20151201/e24941ad/attachment-0001.html>