[Epdp-dt] Team composition - RSSAC omitted

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Mon Jul 16 00:03:23 UTC 2018


hi Heather,

while I don't want to object and raise a problem for us as a group but I
would like to make a point.
I think we are making a GNSO (E)PDP de facto a CCWG regardless if RSSAC or
ccNSO appointing representatives and I don't think this is something we
intended or expect for GNSO PDP. I would like to highlight that we are
setting a precedent here that will be hard to argue against in future.
 I can understand for the idea to be inclusive and open the door to other
SO/AC  since we chose to limit the size and participation but in fact, only
GAC, SSAC and possibly ALAC expressed interest to join the EPDP and shared
some of their positions.  I heard arguments about ccNSO as they may bring
ccTLD operators in EU may bring their own experience(while noticing ccNSO
didn't appoint any representative to RDS2 RT). I am not sure what RSSAC and
so Root Server Operators can bring here as I don't think they are dealing
with whois in any way.

I just wanted to share my thoughts here.


Best,

Rafik

Le dim. 15 juil. 2018 à 19:31, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Dear DT colleagues,
>
> It has come to my attention that we failed to include the RSSAC in the
> SO/AC allocations on the DT. I have checked with the small group, who have
> confirmed that the RSSAC wasn't discussed there. We mentioned SSAC in the
> DT call last week. This makes me think that the RSSAC's absence on the team
> composition document is an oversight in our intense efforts. Equal
> treatment gives them the same as ALAC, ccNSO and SSAC. I'm putting this out
> to the DT mailing list to check if there are any objections. If so, please
> raise these swiftly, as the RSSAC is already behind in terms of the invite
> for participants and we'll need to notify them ASAP. I'd like to give it 24
> hours to be as efficient as possible here.
>
> Many thanks and best wishes,
>
> Heather
> _______________________________________________
> Epdp-dt mailing list
> Epdp-dt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/epdp-dt/attachments/20180716/682051e7/attachment.html>


More information about the Epdp-dt mailing list