[Epdp-dt] Team composition - RSSAC omitted

[Heather Forrest]

Thanks, all, for your rapid responses.

Rafik - I note you specifically stated that your point wasn't to be
understood as an objection. Michele, Ayden, may I check with you both
please that this is also the case for yourselves? I personally believe that
Rafik has made an excellent point but I also note that when PDP
participation is open, we welcome members and observers from throughout the
community. We have the WG Guidelines as a means of differentiating the PDP
from a CCWG here and going forward.

All that said, I hesitate to inform the RSSAC unless we're all in agreement
here that there isn't grounds to object.

Best wishes,

Heather

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
wrote:

> +1 Michele
>
> —Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 16 July 2018 10:47 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <
> michele at blacknight.com> wrote:
>
> I tend to agree with Rafik
>
>
>
> I also don’t understand why RSSAC would be interested in this and even if
> they are they’ll get opportunities to provide input via public comment
> periods etc
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Michele
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
>
> Blacknight Solutions
>
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
> https://www.blacknight.com/
>
> http://blacknight.blog/
>
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
>
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>
> Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
>
> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
>
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>
>
> *From: *Epdp-dt <epdp-dt-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak <
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday 16 July 2018 at 01:04
> *To: *Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"epdp-dt at icann.org" <epdp-dt at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Epdp-dt] Team composition - RSSAC omitted
>
>
>
> hi Heather,
>
>
>
> while I don't want to object and raise a problem for us as a group but I
> would like to make a point.
>
> I think we are making a GNSO (E)PDP de facto a CCWG regardless if RSSAC or
> ccNSO appointing representatives and I don't think this is something we
> intended or expect for GNSO PDP. I would like to highlight that we are
> setting a precedent here that will be hard to argue against in future.
>
>  I can understand for the idea to be inclusive and open the door to other
> SO/AC  since we chose to limit the size and participation but in fact, only
> GAC, SSAC and possibly ALAC expressed interest to join the EPDP and shared
> some of their positions.  I heard arguments about ccNSO as they may bring
> ccTLD operators in EU may bring their own experience(while noticing ccNSO
> didn't appoint any representative to RDS2 RT). I am not sure what RSSAC and
> so Root Server Operators can bring here as I don't think they are dealing
> with whois in any way.
>
>
>
> I just wanted to share my thoughts here.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Rafik
>
> Le dim. 15 juil. 2018 à 19:31, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> Dear DT colleagues,
>
>
>
> It has come to my attention that we failed to include the RSSAC in the
> SO/AC allocations on the DT. I have checked with the small group, who have
> confirmed that the RSSAC wasn't discussed there. We mentioned SSAC in the
> DT call last week. This makes me think that the RSSAC's absence on the team
> composition document is an oversight in our intense efforts. Equal
> treatment gives them the same as ALAC, ccNSO and SSAC. I'm putting this out
> to the DT mailing list to check if there are any objections. If so, please
> raise these swiftly, as the RSSAC is already behind in terms of the invite
> for participants and we'll need to notify them ASAP. I'd like to give it 24
> hours to be as efficient as possible here.
>
>
>
> Many thanks and best wishes,
>
>
>
> Heather
>
> _______________________________________________
> Epdp-dt mailing list
> Epdp-dt at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/epdp-dt
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/epdp-dt/attachments/20180716/91b2c80a/attachment.html>