[Gac-gnso-cg] Charter - Final version ..
Manal Ismail
manal at tra.gov.eg
Tue Jan 21 08:56:08 UTC 2014
In the same context, I want to bring to colleagues' attention the last 2
bullets under the title 'Critical Success Factors' of the charter ..
They state:
- Agree on a follow-up mechanism and success measures
- Maintain a channel to provide feedback to further enhance the
process and document those changes whenever applicable
Both points are relevant to post-implementation assessment, which I
believe is a bit early to decide before agreeing on cooperation
mechanisms ..
On another note, I would like to grasp the opportunity to make another
minor comment on the charter .. I have the feeling that the term
'reverse liaison' is difficult to understand 'reverse to what', unless
you have the necessary background:
- there used to be a GAC liaison to the GNSO
- the model had its own challenges
- one suggestion is, to try having a reverse liaison, from the GNSO
to the GAC
So if colleagues acknowledge the challenge, I suggest we have this
resolved simply by:
- either writing 'GNSO Liaison to the GAC', without the quotations,
before the first occurrence of 'reverse liaison'
- or have a footnote at the first occurrence of 'reverse liaison',
stating background information along the lines of the above 3 bullets
Hope this makes sense ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
-----Original Message-----
From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 10:29 PM
To: Ana Neves; Mike O'Connor
Cc: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Charter - Final version ..
Many thanks Mikey for the reminder ..
Like Ana, I see the merit behind the 'middle ground' option, which
implies some further commitment to ensure that our set of
recommendations works well in practice ..
Yet, I see this more of a solution aspect rather than a charter one .. I
like the current focused mandate, limited timeline and suggested
milestones as stated in the charter .. When we come to compiling our
recommendations, we can then include one that stresses the need for
post-implementation assessment and fine tuning .. This assessment can be
done by this consultation group, a smaller group, a totally new one, a
mix of old and new members or any other options as agreed by then ..
Looking forward to hearing what other colleagues think ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
-----Original Message-----
From: Ana Neves [mailto:Ana.Neves at fct.pt]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 4:21 PM
To: Mike O'Connor
Cc: Manal Ismail; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Charter - Final version ..
Thanks, Mikey.
I world be in favour to the "middle ground" proposal for the timeline as
it would allow,?as you well said, a post-implementation assessment. What
we're trying to build here is not an easy task and could be very useful
to follow the process at least for 2 years.
My humble opinion at this stage...
Best, Ana
Sent from my iPhone
On 20/01/2014, at 13:01, "Mike O'Connor"
<mike at haven2.com<mailto:mike at haven2.com>> wrote:
there's one thing i forgot to add to that draft.
we had a discussion about how long this committee should last. an idea
came to me this morning that would represent a middle option between two
extremes.
short extreme - we wrap up after our recommendations have been accepted
by the GAC and the GNSO
middle ground - we wrap up after our recommendations have gone through a
post-implementation assessment (1-2 years out)
long extreme - we continue on as a standing committee
i think part of the reason i forgot to add this to the "timeline"
section is because i wasn't clear what our view was - so maybe we could
have a quick discussion about this on the list before the meeting
tomorrow?
mikey
On Jan 20, 2014, at 6:35 AM, Manal Ismail
<manal at tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg>> wrote:
Many thanks Mikey !!
We, Jonathan and I, have added the signing off of the charter to
tomorrow's conference call agenda, which I will be circulating shortly
..
Hope everyone will be ready to adopt the charter by then ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike at haven2.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 3:07 PM
To: Manal Ismail; Marika Konings
Cc: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Charter - Final version ..
hi all,
oops - i didn't structure the action items in my notes from our last
call very well, so i didn't put a trigger in there reminding myself to
update and circulate the draft.
here's a draft for people to review, based on the notes from that call.
my mistake, sorry about that.
mikey
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB:
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for
Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
_______________________________________________
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org<mailto:Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
_______________________________________________
Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140121/74de85e3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gac-gnso-cg
mailing list