[Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call

Thu Aug 3 19:19:50 UTC 2017

I support Sara’s proposed language.

From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins at icann.org>
Reply-To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM
To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call

Thanks, Sara! What do others think of this proposed language? 

-----Original Message-----

From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of gtheo

Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 3:27 AM

To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org

Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 August PP IRT call

I like that language, Sara.

Thanks,

Theo

Sara Bockey schreef op 2017-08-02 11:33 PM:

Hi All,

Regarding Section 3.5.4.1, what if we used language that provided some 

flexibility regarding the time frame? For example:

A Customer's willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable 

information, its willful failure to update information provided to 

Provider within seven (7) days of any change, OR ITS FAILURE TO 

RESPOND TO PROVIDER INQUIRIES WITHIN THE TIME FRAME REQUIRED BY 

PROVIDER’S TOS (NOT TO EXCEED (15) DAYS) concerning the accuracy of 

contact details associated with the Registered Name for which Provider 

is providing the Services constitute a material breach of the service 

agreement between such Customer and Provider and be a basis for 

suspension or cancellation of the Services.

Sara

SARA BOCKEY

POLICY MANAGER | GODADDY™

SBOCKEY at GODADDY.COM  480-366-3616

SKYPE: SBOCKEY

_This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use 

only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential 

information. If you have received this email in error, please 

immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and 

any copy of this message and its attachments._

FROM: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins 

<amy.bivins at icann.org>

REPLY-TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org"

<gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>

DATE: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 12:32 PM

TO: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>

SUBJECT: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1 

August PP IRT call

Dear Colleagues,

Thanks so much for your active participation on today’s Privacy/Proxy 

IRT call. We made a lot of progress. If you were unable to attend, the 

recording and materials are available on the wiki, 

https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/01+August+2017.

I’ve updated the issues list (attached) for the topics discussed today 

(Issues 5, 6, 9, 10, 13) based on your feedback.

IRT ACTION ITEMS

        * Please provide any additional input you have on issues 5, 6, 9, 10, 

and 13 NO LATER THAN NEXT MONDAY, 7 AUGUST. In particular, please 

consider the following questions that arose during today’s meeting:

        * Regarding issue 6 (Section 3.5.4.1 of the draft PPAA), should we 

consider reducing the required period from 15 days to some shortened 

period? If yes, do you have recommendations for what the shortened 

time period should be?

        * Regarding issue 13 (PPAA section 5.7.1): (i) Is it feasible for a 

registrar to block new registrations from a suspended provider 

(provided that provider is identified by its ICANN ID during the 

registration process)? (IRT input on this point has been mixed); (ii) 

If the answer to (i) is yes, is any additional language required with 

respect to Point 5 raised during the call (“sounds like we need an EPP 

for PP Providers”)?

        * Please complete the IRT poll re: data escrow and additional PPAA 

discussion topics no later than Friday, 4 August, 

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/62XCMSS

  NEXT WEEK

  Next week, we plan to discuss Issues 4 and 23(data retention), 12 

(accreditation term), 15 (Customer Data Accuracy Spec), 17-19 (LEA 

Specification). We will discuss data retention and the LEA 

specification first, to ensure we can discuss both of these while we 

have our PSWG colleagues on the call.

  Thanks in advance for your continued consideration of the issues 

discussed today and your completion of the poll. If you have questions 

or comments before our next meeting, please send them to the list.

  Best,

  Amy

AMY E. BIVINS

Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager

Registrar Services and Industry Relations

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551

Fax:  +1 (202) 789-0104

Email: amy.bivins at icann.org

www.icann.org [1]

Links:

------

[1] http://www.icann.org

_______________________________________________

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

_______________________________________________

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

_______________________________________________

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl/attachments/20170803/d5b7fd57/attachment-0001.html>