[Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updated draft Section 2, questions to continue reviewing on 31 January IRT call

[Amy Bivins]

Hi, All,

 

Per the additional comments on the list, I've updated this Section 2
document slightly, and I've incorporated additional questions into this
document to continue our discussion next week. 

 

On our upcoming call on Tuesday, 31 January, at 15:00 UTC, discussion on
this Section 2 document will pick up at Section II.E, Terms and Conditions.

 

Update on ICANN58 Meeting

It has been decided that we will have a half-day IRT meeting at ICANN58, on
Saturday, 11 March, in the afternoon (I have requested space for the three
afternoon time slots-so we will have space from 1:45-6:30). I apologize for
the late notice on the approved day. As this is an official meeting day, I
realize there may be conflicts, but I hope that you can attend so that we
can make the most of this time. If you have questions, please let me know.

 

Initial Discussion Question

Before we dive back into Section 2 on Tuesday, I'm going to ask for your
feedback about one set of recommendations. The recommendations are as
follows:  

 

(see P13, item 15)  A uniform set of minimum mandatory criteria that must be
followed for the purpose of reporting abuse and submitting requests
(including requests for the Disclosure of customer information) should be
developed. Forms that may be required by individual P/P service providers
for this purpose should also include space for free form text. P/P service
providers should also have the ability to "categorize" reports received, in
order to facilitate responsiveness. P/P service providers must also state
the applicable jurisdiction in which disputes (including any arising under
the Illustrative Disclosure Framework in Annex B) should be resolved on any
forms used for reporting and requesting purposes.

 

(see p.64) The WG also recommends that the use of standard forms and other
mechanisms that would facilitate the prompt and accurate identification of a
Relay request be explored during implementation (e.g. drop-down menus in a
provider's web-based forms or fields that would require the filling in of a
Requester's contact details, specifying the type of request or other basic
information).

 

These recommendations seem to indicate that this implementation should
deliver (a) minimum mandatory criteria and required processes for abuse
reports, information requests, and relay requests, by (b) developing a list
of standard categories for requests to PP service providers and (c)
identifying any specific requirements for the individual types of requests
or reports. 

 

Can the IRT provide any further guidance regarding what the PDP WG intended
here or confirm whether this understanding is correct?

 

Amy E. Bivins

Registrar Policy Services Manager

Registrar Services and Industry Relations

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551

Fax:  +1 (202) 789-0104

Email: amy.bivins at icann.org

www.icann.org

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl/attachments/20170127/0f4ca353/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Section2_IRTv3.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 369524 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl/attachments/20170127/0f4ca353/Section2_IRTv3-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5025 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl/attachments/20170127/0f4ca353/smime-0001.p7s>