[Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59

[DiBiase, Gregory]

+1

From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Roger D Carney
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:16 AM
To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59

+1


From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:31 AM
To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59

Hi Sarah,

I'll answer, but also encourage others to weigh in. In short, the discussion on the calls was that the initial 24-hour period for reviewing all requests that come in was too short, which is why the change was suggested there. There did not seem to be any suggestion to change the action period for "high priority" requests following the initial review period (in this instance, the total time from receipt of request to a required action would be two business days + 24 hours).

Hope this helps!

Amy

From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:27 AM
To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59

Hi all,

Just a question - I notice that in 3.2.1 we've changed the review timeframe from 24 hours to two business days, but then down in 4.1.2 it's 24 hours to action a High Priority request. Were we OK with this because it's High Priority?

Thanks,

--
Sarah Wyld | Product Manager
5915 Airport Rd | Mississauga, ON L4V1T1
p 905.673.7575 | x6832
swyld at hostopia.com<mailto:swyld at hostopia.com>
hostopia.com

Hostopia, a Deluxe(r) company.  Behind the brands that power small business.SM

NOTE:  The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:59 AM
To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux at icann.org<mailto:fabien.betremieux at icann.org>>; Nick Shorey <lists at nickshorey.com<mailto:lists at nickshorey.com>>
Cc: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59

Nick and Fabien,

Attached, you will find a markup of the PSWG's LEA disclosure framework proposal, including items that the IRT wishes to discuss during the face-to-face in J'burg.

The most substantive topics are in Sections 1.4, 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2.1. Given the very short 45-minute meeting time, I'd suggest that discussion start on those points so that time isn't lost during the F2F on some of the more minor suggested edits.

As you know, I am not traveling to ICANN59, but I will be dialed in. Jennifer Gore is going to be the staff facilitator, as logistics may make it difficult to facilitate remotely.

Proposed Agenda

*        Intro (Jennifer Gore)

*        IRT overview of proposed discussion topics (IRT members Roger Carney and Eric Rokobauer have offered to lead)

*        IRT/PSWG discussion

*        Next steps-Plan for IRT/PSWG refinement of draft framework as materials are prepared for public comment



Meeting Details

*        Tuesday, 27 June, 1415-1500 local time

*        Location: Boardroom 3 (Note-this is a very small room that seats approximately 24 people. Seating preference will be given to IRT and PSWG members and staff facilitator)

*        Remote participation link: https://participate.icann.org/ppirt

*        Phone bridge information will be distributed in separate meeting invite.



We look forward to what we hope will be a productive discussion and thank you and your team for your help in securing meeting space and logistics on-site. If you have questions or suggestions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me.



Best,


Amy E. Bivins
Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager
Registrar Services and Industry Relations
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
Fax:  +1 (202) 789-0104
Email: amy.bivins at icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins at icann.org>
www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl/attachments/20170622/b436751a/attachment.html>