[Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] PPAA Reporting Specification Attached for IRT review

Volker Greimann vgreimann at key-systems.net
Fri Feb 16 16:15:20 UTC 2018


Annual is periodic, right? So if every provider send ICANN an email 
including this statistic data on or around Dec 31, this recommendation 
would be fulfilled from the providers' side. ICANN then only needs to 
aggregate this data and provide the data to the public in aggregated form.

Let's aim for the simplest implementation. If you want, we can discuss 
the format that these mails should have so you have standardization if 
that worries you, but the recommendation requires only this:

/Name of provider://
/

/Number of publication requests received:/

/Number of publication requests honored:/

/Number of disclosure requests received:/

/Number of disclosure requests honored:/

Don't ask us to implement something for this if it can be fulfilled much 
simpler.

Volker


Am 16.02.2018 um 16:58 schrieb Amy Bivins:
>
> Hi, All,
>
> Apologies for the delayed response on this one. To be clear—if you 
> have ideas for how we can make this easier for providers, while 
> following the WG recommendation, we can certainly make some changes to 
> this proposal. As a reminder, the WG recommendation was: /“providers 
> should be required to maintain statistics on the number of Publication 
> and Disclosure requests received and the number honored, and provide 
> these statistics in aggregate form to ICANN for periodic publication. 
> The data should be aggregated so as not to create a market where 
> nefarious users of the domain name system are able to use the 
> information to find the P/P service that is least likely to make 
> Disclosures.”/ (See Final Report, p. 18).
>
> The recommendation for two reports—one showing requests by TLD and 
> another by registrar—was simply an idea for a way to parse the data to 
> gain more information, but we don’t have to proceed this way. The 
> thinking was that being able to see numbers of requests by TLD and by 
> registrar could provide more information about where abuse (or alleged 
> abuse) is more or less frequent. But there’s nothing in the WG 
> recommendation that requires that.
>
> However, regarding the recommendation that providers simply be able to 
> send an email to ICANN with these numbers, we don’t think this is 
> feasible. There needs to be standardization of the reports so that 
> they can be aggregated and published on a TBD frequency (if 
> less-frequent than a month is preferred by the IRT, we have some room 
> to work here as the Final Report didn’t specify frequency). We are 
> proposing to use the RRI interface, as contracted parties in the IRT 
> expressed an interest in this tool earlier in the IRT discussions.
>
> Best,
>
> Amy
>
> *From:*Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl 
> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *theo geurts
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 14, 2018 9:58 AM
> *To:* gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org; Michele Neylon - Blacknight 
> <michele at blacknight.com>; Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-systems.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] PPAA Reporting Specification 
> Attached for IRT review
>
> Exactly Michele,
>
> I am not sure we can automate the tracking here when it comes to 
> disclosure requests without some serious investment.
>  If we cannot automate this, it will be manual labor, which is also 
> very costly.
> The tracking of the different phases is just way to complex.
>
> Are we trying to solve something here or merely following marching 
> orders from the WG? Which is an option, but then I would like to ask 
> the WG if this is what they thought it would be and if they realized 
> the attached costs to such a reporting system?
>
> Theo
>
> On 14-2-2018 15:42, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>
>     I’ve been discussing this internally
>
>     One of the queries I have is why on earth you need to generate two
>     reports. The TLD data is already included in the first one.
>
>     --
>
>     Mr Michele Neylon
>
>     Blacknight Solutions
>
>     Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>
>     https://www.blacknight.com/
>
>     http://blacknight.blog/
>
>     Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
>
>     Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>
>     Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ <https://michele.blog/>
>
>     Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ <https://ceo.hosting/>
>
>     -------------------------------
>
>     Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>     Park,Sleaty
>
>     Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>     *From: *Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl
>     <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org>
>     <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of theo
>     geurts <gtheo at xs4all.nl> <mailto:gtheo at xs4all.nl>
>     *Reply-To: *"gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org"
>     <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
>     <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org> <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
>     *Date: *Wednesday 14 February 2018 at 14:41
>     *To: *"gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org"
>     <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
>     <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
>     <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>, Volker Greimann
>     <vgreimann at key-systems.net> <mailto:vgreimann at key-systems.net>
>     *Subject: *Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] PPAA Reporting Specification
>     Attached for IRT review
>
>     Agreed with Volker,
>
>     Perhaps we should zoom in a little next week what exactly we
>     envision here. Part of the debate, what do these numbers tell us
>     exactly? How are they useful? Etc.
>
>     Theo
>
>     On 14-2-2018 12:08, Volker Greimann wrote:
>
>         As this adds a whole new level of bureaucracy to the already
>         highly manual amount of work that abuse departments have to
>         deal with and as it is something that only applies to privacy
>         service providers and not to registrars, we should aim at
>         making this as lightweight as possible. We should not require
>         additional implementatation work or APIs, a quarterly or even
>         annual email to ICANN should be sufficient.
>
>         Volker
>
>         Am 13.02.2018 um 21:22 schrieb Amy Bivins:
>
>             Dear Colleagues,
>
>             A new draft PPAA specification, the monthly reporting
>             specification, is ready for your review. This
>             specification includes the requirements for provider
>             reports to ICANN.
>
>             This specification is proposed to implement the
>             recommendation from the Final Report, /“providers should
>             be required to maintain statistics on the number of
>             Publication and Disclosure requests received and the
>             number honored, and provide these statistics in aggregate
>             form to ICANN for periodic publication. The data should be
>             aggregated so as not to create a market where nefarious
>             users of the domain name system are able to use the
>             information to find the P/P service that is least likely
>             to make Disclosures.”/ (See Final Report, p. 18).
>
>             We can discuss this during our call next week if you have
>             any questions or comments.  I’ll also be sending the
>             updated Applicant Guide to the list later this week, for
>             discussion on Tuesday.
>
>             Looking ahead, we are working to finalize the RRI
>             Specification that accompanies the attached reporting
>             specification. The RRI Specification will include the
>             technical specifics for submitting these reports via the
>             API. I’ll send it to the list as soon as it is available.
>             We are also in the process of reviewing the Labeling
>             Specification, pursuant to IRT feedback, and will have an
>             updated draft for the IRT to review as soon as possible.
>
>             Best,
>
>             Amy
>
>             *Amy E. Bivins*
>
>             Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager
>
>             Registrar Services and Industry Relations
>
>             Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>             Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
>
>             Fax:  +1 (202) 789-0104
>
>             Email: amy.bivins at icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins at icann.org>
>
>             www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>
>             Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
>
>             Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
>
>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
>
>         Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org<mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
>
>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
>
>     Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org <mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl
>

-- 
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.

--------------------------------------------

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -

Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net

Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com

Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems

CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534

Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu

This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl/attachments/20180216/ad96dd4a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list