[Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] PP IRT question, no meeting Tues, fees info to be distributed shortly

[theo geurts]

Hi Amy,

I think that recommendation still stands. Flexibility is key here.

Thanks,

Theo


On 20-5-2018 19:46, Amy Bivins wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> This week’s PP IRT meeting will be canceled, as the issues on our 
> to-do list this week can be addressed without a call.
>
> *We have one question for you, below. Please consider this issue and 
> provide your comments on this no later than 28 May.* I hope to be able 
> to update you later this week on the status of the RrSG request 
> (received by ICANN 4 May) to pause this IRT’s work (and the COA’s 
> letter in opposition). I also expect to be able to send the 
> fees-related documentation to you within the next couple of days.
>
> _Background_
>
> The IRT has recommended that, with respect to the data escrow 
> specification, Privacy and Proxy service providers that are affiliated 
> with an ICANN-accredited registrar should be able to meet their data 
> escrow deposit obligations through the registrar (so the registrar 
> would deposit the PP registration data and underlying customer data, 
> similar to the process currently followed under the interim RAA 
> specification).
>
> In order to achieve this result, ICANN would need to make slight 
> updates to the Registrar Data Escrow specification, to add two 
> required data elements for the deposit (the privacy/proxy service 
> provider ID and the domain ID).
>
> *_Question:_ *Is this an acceptable result (updating registrar data 
> escrow specification for PP-affiliated registrars that wish to have 
> combined data escrow deposits), or should ICANN revert to having a 
> completely separate data escrow specification that all PPs must 
> deposit under, regardless of whether the PP is affiliated with a 
> registrar or not? Please note that, regardless of the answer to this 
> question, there will be a separate PP data escrow specification for 
> (a) third-party providers and (b) providers that work with more than 1 
> registrar.
>
> Based on discussions thus far, we believe the intent was the former 
> (updating the registrar specification) but we wanted to confirm before 
> finalizing that proposed update to the registrar specification and 
> distributing it to the designated data escrow agents to alert them to 
> the proposed update.
>
> Best,
>
> Amy
>
> *Amy E. Bivins*
>
> Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager
>
> Registrar Services and Industry Relations
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
>
> Fax:  +1 (202) 789-0104
>
> Email: amy.bivins at icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins at icann.org>
>
> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
> Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl/attachments/20180520/78d2b692/attachment.html>