[GNSO-Accuracy-ST] UDRP review

[Scott Austin]

Roger:
I concur with Steve and believe this is a useful exercise. As one who has been involved in UDRP matters for many years would like among those participating in the small team you mention.


Best regards,
Scott

Please click on a link below to calendar a 15, 30, or 60 minute call with me:
  a 15-minute call<calendly.com/saustin2/15min>    a 30-minute call<calendly.com/saustin2/30min>    a 60-minute call<calendly.com/saustin2/60min>

[cid:image001.png at 01D81CF6.E56ABDA0][IntellectualPropertyLaw 100]    [microbadge[1]] <http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/33308-fl-scott-austin-1261914.html>
Scott R. Austin | Board Certified Intellectual Property Attorney | VLP Law Group LLP
101 NE Third Avenue, Suite 1500, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: (954) 204-3744 | Fax: (954) 320-0233 | SAustin at VLPLawGroup.com<mailto:SAustin at VLPLawGroup.com>

From: GNSO-Accuracy-ST <gnso-accuracy-st-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Steve Crocker
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 2:10 PM
To: Roger D Carney <rcarney at godaddy.com>
Cc: gnso-accuracy-st at icann.org
Subject: Re: [GNSO-Accuracy-ST] UDRP review

This touches directly on things I'm currently paying attention to.  I'll be glad to participate.

Steve


On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 2:04 PM Roger D Carney via GNSO-Accuracy-ST <gnso-accuracy-st at icann.org<mailto:gnso-accuracy-st at icann.org>> wrote:
Good Afternoon,

Several times during our deliberations, the issue of registration data accuracy and UDRPs has been raised, with Becky even suggesting an X/Y summary in chat last week. Although some anecdotes were provided, the CPH would like to propose a review of UDRP decisions to determine the extent of registration data inaccuracies in UDRPs, as well as the impact of those inaccuracies on UDRP proceedings. We believe that obtaining comprehensive data regarding the issue should help guide our deliberations.

Two UDRP providers (WIPO and the Forum) have easily accessible (and searchable) Decisions. WIPO has almost 49,000 Decisions (of which 764 include the word “inaccurate”), and the Forum has almost 32,000 Decisions (of which 188 include the work “inaccurate”). The other providers do not have easily accessible online databases (or limited search capabilities).

The CPH proposes the Scoping Team create a small team to determine how to gather and then review the data. There are several methods to do so, and we think this is something that is well suited to a small team.


Thanks
Roger

_______________________________________________
GNSO-Accuracy-ST mailing list
GNSO-Accuracy-ST at icann.org<mailto:GNSO-Accuracy-ST at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-accuracy-st<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-accuracy-st>

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.


This message contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please send me an email and delete this message. Any tax advice provided by VLP is for your use only and cannot be used to avoid tax penalties or for promotional or marketing purposes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/attachments/20220208/ea8f47ad/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11048 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/attachments/20220208/ea8f47ad/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1121 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/attachments/20220208/ea8f47ad/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1901 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/attachments/20220208/ea8f47ad/image003-0001.jpg>