[GNSO-Accuracy-ST] Combined Response Harald & Steve Response

Tue Mar 8 22:25:55 UTC 2022

I do not agree with either of the options in the doodle poll.  As I said 
the other day, I am not exactly delirious about the definition that the 
Rrs have come up with, as it seems to still dodge a clear analysis of 
what we mean by referring back to contract. I agree with Volker that you 
need to include a none of the above, or a place to propose something.

Since the form would not let me abstain from choosing, I had to leave 
the poll....but please do not infer a lack of interest in this question 
from your failure to receive a reply from me.

Kind regards,

Stephanie Perrin

On 2022-03-08 9:50 a.m., Volker Greimann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> may I suggest that the poll be changed as it would benefit from a 
> "None of the Above" or "Other: [Specify]" Option.
>
> My response would be as follows:
> The term of accuracy should be defined as conforming with the data 
> accuracy requirements of the RAA.
>
> -- 
> Volker A. Greimann
> General Counsel and Policy Manager
> *KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH*
>
> T: +49 6894 9396901
> M: +49 6894 9396851
> F: +49 6894 9396851
> W: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net/>
>
> Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of 
> Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835
> CEO: Oliver Fries and Robert Birkner
>
> Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in 
> England and Wales with company number 8576358.
>
> This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended 
> only for the person(s) directly addressed. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, any use, copying, transmission, distribution, or other 
> forms of dissemination is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
> this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
> permanently delete this email with any files that may be attached.
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> 
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:34 PM Marika Konings 
> <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>
>     Apologies, but please use this link to respond to the survey:
>     https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdL-R4Tk7pP86bMIRMX1tH1IA9-UgbHFYVJyznlBcQjch99Pg/viewform.
>     Thanks to Sarah for helping solve the access issue!
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Marika
>
>     *From: *GNSO-Accuracy-ST <gnso-accuracy-st-bounces at icann.org> on
>     behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>     *Date: *Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 12:47
>     *To: *"michael at palage.com" <michael at palage.com>,
>     "gnso-accuracy-st at icann.org" <gnso-accuracy-st at icann.org>
>     *Subject: *Re: [GNSO-Accuracy-ST] Combined Response Harald & Steve
>     Response
>
>     Dear All,
>
>     Per Michael’s request, please complete the following survey:
>     https://forms.gle/i9JUx45KSRWvktKU6 [forms.gle]
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/forms.gle/i9JUx45KSRWvktKU6__;!!PtGJab4!rQG6Xsn6taQEsnZhno3se_bnN0yrUB9v2iNWReklt7NWvLef8aahfIHz_HmxYSmMDQbB2LAa0A$>.
>     Please make sure that you are logged into your google account to
>     be able to participate. To view the responses, you can go here:
>     https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1huYshCctSE83LjVhU6MMom7oykT3WMIYLjixanQd1L0/viewanalytics
>     [docs.google.com]
>     <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/forms/d/1huYshCctSE83LjVhU6MMom7oykT3WMIYLjixanQd1L0/viewanalytics__;!!PtGJab4!rQG6Xsn6taQEsnZhno3se_bnN0yrUB9v2iNWReklt7NWvLef8aahfIHz_HmxYSmMDQZ-aLZVTQ$>.
>     For those that already responded on the list with your answer, we
>     would appreciate if you could also respond to the survey.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>
>     *From: *GNSO-Accuracy-ST <gnso-accuracy-st-bounces at icann.org> on
>     behalf of Michael Palage <michael at palage.com>
>     *Reply to: *"michael at palage.com" <michael at palage.com>
>     *Date: *Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 07:39
>     *To: *"gnso-accuracy-st at icann.org" <gnso-accuracy-st at icann.org>
>     *Subject: *[GNSO-Accuracy-ST] Combined Response Harald & Steve
>     Response
>
>     Hello All,
>
>     This is a joint response to the emails of Harald and Steve which
>     both seem to focus on “purpose.” Harald was articulating his view
>     of purpose being “contact ability” and Steve articulating his view
>     of purpose being focused on “parties receiving the data.”
>
>     Respectfully, I believe that defining “accuracy” is a condition
>     precedent before we consider “purpose” based upon the following
>     instructions in our Charter from the GNSO Council:
>
>     In carrying out its work above, the Scoping Team is expected to
>     take into account the policy recommendations from the EPDP on gTLD
>     Registration Data (EPDP) Team that have been adopted by the GNSO
>     Council and the ICANN Board, including the *EPDP-identified
>     purposes* and the related data processing activities. However,
>     *the scoping team is not tasked to review these purposes or
>     suggest changes*. *If the scoping team finds that further review
>     of these purposes is necessary, especially in the context of
>     implementation and enforcement of existing requirements, it will
>     identify this as an area of further work in its recommendations.*
>
>     **
>
>     Our ability to suggest potential changes to “purpose” outside of
>     those identified in EPDP Phase 1 Recommendation #1 is limited to
>     identifying potential changes necessary within the context of
>     implementation and enforcement of existing requirements.
>
>     To be clear I am not making any determination at this time
>     regarding necessity within the context of implementation and
>     enforcement of existing requirements, although I suspect based on
>     previous discussions where the individuals members will line up on
>     this question. However, I am NOT asking that question at this time.
>
>     I will be asking our ICANN Org colleagues to send out a Doddle
>     Poll as that makes participation / non-participation easier to track.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Michael
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     GNSO-Accuracy-ST mailing list
>     GNSO-Accuracy-ST at icann.org
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-accuracy-st
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>     your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing
>     list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
>     and so on.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-Accuracy-ST mailing list
> GNSO-Accuracy-ST at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-accuracy-st
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/attachments/20220308/1ba6ba29/attachment-0001.html>