[Gnso-bylaws-dt] Actions & Notes: GNSO Drafting Team Meeting 15 May 21:00 UTC

[Julie Hedlund]

Dear all,

Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the GNSO Drafting Team meeting held on 15 May 2019 (21:00-22:00 UTC).  Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes.  Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=108332293.

Best Regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

ACTIONS & NOTES:

Actions:


  1.  Timeline: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review.
  2.  Section 18.12 Special IFRs: David McAuley will redraft Section 4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes
  3.  Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.
  4.  Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.

Notes:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest: No updates.

2. Timeline:

ACTION: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review.

3. Section 18.12 Special IFRs:

a. Guidelines for How to Use the GNSO Input Process for a Special IFR

4.1 Introduction

-- “Must select a decision process and document its deliberations and decisions.  Council [may use the GIP to determine]...”  -- keep it simple.
-- Or could say, “should consider”.

4.3 and 4.4: -- Resolve Wolf-Ulrich’s comment -- don’t make the change.  This reflects the order of the GIP.

4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes

-- Question: Section 4.5 GIP will be seeking input from SOs/ACs, but it’s not clear if this has happened or will be in conjunction with ccNSO.
-- Interpret as ccNSO and GNSO doing it together and it would have been completed.
-- There is also the issue of public comment.  It is confusing in this document.
-- Need to note the time for consultation with SOs/ACs and public comment.
-- Flag for redrafting. See suggested language in the text by Steve DelBianco.
ACTION: David McAuley agreed to review and redraft.

b. ccNSO/GNSO guidelines

-- staff is drafting, inquiry into ICANN Legal on initiation of a Special IFR
-- Maxim’s concerns about what is the “consultation”?
-- Make it clear in the guidelines what the outcome is with the discussion with Legal.

4. Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.

5. Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-bylaws-dt/attachments/20190516/c22568d1/attachment.html>