[Gnso-dmpm-wg] [Dmpm] Re: Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1
Tony Onorato
tony.onorato at FisherBroyles.com
Wed Jul 22 19:55:36 UTC 2015
Berry -
My sense is to measure success based on two binary questions: (1) did the WG use data and/or metrics as part of its process (e.g., in scoping/defining the issue, prioritizing the issues under consideration, and/or guiding the WG to an informed recommendation on the issue under consideration), and (2) [was the incorporation of data and/or metrics] [or] [were the data/metrics] useful to the WG in its process?
Best,
Tony
Tony Onorato, Esq./CIPP(US)
FisherBroyles, LLP
Directs: 202.459.3599/646.397.4750 | Fax: 516.706.9809 | tony.onorato at fisherbroyles.com<mailto:tony.onorato at fisherbroyles.com> | fisherbroyles.com<http://www.fsblegal.com/>
From: Berry Cobb [mailto:mail at berrycobb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:33 PM
To: dmpm at icann.kavi.com; gnso-dmpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: [Dmpm] Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1
All,
In making updates to the next version of our draft initial report, I reminded myself that we also need to include under the recommendation details some set of "measure of success." I think it will benefit to provide at least a simple idea of success for the community to respond to. Else, I suspect that if comments are not submitted to that regard, it will be asked by the GNSO Council.
Please provide input on the list, and I can add the groups ideas to the draft. I will include a placeholder in the document.
Thank you.
B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail at berrycobb.com<mailto:mail at berrycobb.com>
@berrycobb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-dmpm-wg/attachments/20150722/001b0c23/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Gnso-dmpm-wg
mailing list