[Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Question a6
mesumbeslin at gmail.com
Wed Dec 15 03:00:29 UTC 2021
My apologies again for being unable to attend the call synchronously due to
I just want to add to the discussion on question (a6) that considering
that the recommendation already states that backward compatibility MUST be
supported by future RZLGRs, I don't see why we should tolerate a case where
the RZLGR is not backward compatible. I don't believe we need to consider
grandfathering existing TLDs if future RZLGRs MUST be backward compatible
with existing versions of the RZLGR.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-epdp-idn-team