[Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Question a6

Tomslin Samme-Nlar mesumbeslin at gmail.com
Wed Dec 15 03:00:29 UTC 2021

Dear all,

My apologies again for being unable to attend the call synchronously due to
timezone challenges.

I just want to add to the discussion  on question (a6) that considering
that the recommendation already states that backward compatibility MUST be
supported by future RZLGRs, I don't see why we should tolerate a case where
the RZLGR is not backward compatible. I don't believe we need to consider
grandfathering existing TLDs if future RZLGRs MUST be backward compatible
with existing versions of the RZLGR.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-idn-team/attachments/20211215/943a3616/attachment.html>

More information about the Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list