[Gnso-epdp-idn-team] REMINDER - Your Input Requested: String Similarity Review Level & Rationale

[Tomslin Samme-Nlar]

Greetings all,

My preferred level is *level-2*.
It offers the opportunity to narrow the chances of any confuseability
strings in the same round, which improves predictability in my mind. And
cost-wise, it presents a good balance between the 3 options.

Warmly,
Tomslin

On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, 22:29 Ariel Liang, <ariel.liang at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear EPDP Team,
>
>
>
> This is a reminder to provide your input on the string similarity review
> levels.
>
>
>
> Thanks very much to Michael and Anil for the input on list. Please be so
> kind to provide rationale for your preferred level and responses to the
> three questions as well.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
> *From: *Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, April 20, 2022 at 1:59 PM
> *To: *"gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Your Input Requested: String Similarity Review Level &
> Rationale
>
>
>
> Dear EPDP Team,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the discussions to date on the string similarity review
> topic (charter questions E3, E1 (part1) and E3a). The leadership team
> appreciates that this is a difficult topic and that a range of views are
> evident across the Team, particularly on the three levels of string
> similarity review
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/192217195/EPDP%20Team%20Meeting%20%2330%20Slides%20-%20E3%2C%20E1%2C%20E3a.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1649976844000&api=v2>
> .
>
>
>
> In order to facilitate the continued deliberation of this topic, the
> Leadership Team requests members to consider the three levels of string
> similarity review and *indicate your preferred level of review, along
> with the reasons why this is your preferred level, on the list by
> Wednesday, 27 April 2022. *
>
>
>
> When sharing your preference, please include responses to the following
> questions:
>
>
>
>    1. Why do you believe your preferred level of review is the most
>    appropriate?
>    2. Based on your preferred level of review, what would be the string
>    similarity review’s impact on preventing user confusion and
>    security/stability issues in the DNS? In other words, how effective would
>    string similarity review be in preventing delegation of similar strings?
>    3. Have you considered the feasibility of implementing the string
>    similarity review based on your preferred level? For example, the
>    complexity and costs involved to conduct the resulting review.
>
>
>
> The string similarity review topic is expected to be discussed again
> during the EPDP Team meeting next week (28 April 2022) and members and
> participants will be invited to speak to their respective preferences and
> rationales. As a reminder, the three levels are as follows (please see
> details in the slide deck
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/192217195/EPDP%20Team%20Meeting%20%2330%20Slides%20-%20E3%2C%20E1%2C%20E3a.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1649976844000&api=v2>
> ):
>
>    - *Level 1*: Primary + ONLY Requested Allocatable Variants
>    - *Level 2*: Primary + ALL Allocatable Variants
>    - *Level 3*: Primary + ALL Allocatable and Blocked Variants
>
> Thank you for your contribution!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve, Emily, Ariel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-idn-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-idn-team/attachments/20220427/cdb53bb2/attachment-0001.html>