[Gnso-epdp-idn-team] [Ext] Re: Draft Outcome: Group 2 Charter Questions Related to "Same Entity" Principle at Top-Level

[Satish Babu]

Thanks very much, Ariel.

With kind regards






satish

On Fri, Jul 8, 2022, 07:15 Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org> wrote:

> Thank you for the request, Satish.
>
>
>
> Per discussion during the EPDP Team meeting, the deadline for reviewing
> the draft outcome language of Group 2 charter questions has been extended
> by one week, by *EOB Friday, 15 July.*
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Satish Babu <sbabu at ieee.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 12:14 AM
> *To: *Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Draft Outcome: Group 2 Charter
> Questions Related to "Same Entity" Principle at Top-Level
>
>
>
> Dear Ariel
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reminder.
>
>
>
> The ALAC team would like to request for more time to respond to the Group
> 2 CQs, if possible a week's time.
>
>
>
> With kind regards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> satish
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:28 PM Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> This is a friendly reminder for reviewing the draft outcome language for
> Group 2 charter questions by *EOB Friday, 8 July*. Please see details
> below.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
> *From: *Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> *Date: *Friday, June 24, 2022 at 11:43 AM
> *To: *"gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Draft Outcome: Group 2 Charter Questions Related to "Same
> Entity" Principle at Top-Level
>
>
>
> Dear All
>
>
>
> Please find the draft outcome language for Group 2 charter questions related
> to “same entity” principle at the top-level, which are:
>
>    - B1, B2, B3, B5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15YGISgNQYL_VfcVVZ6E97qbo42GPziP6x089bR3wgZw/edit?usp=sharing
>    [docs.google.com]
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/15YGISgNQYL_VfcVVZ6E97qbo42GPziP6x089bR3wgZw/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!9apinQkY_iIwAnFoEIkZCcq0k1jHxDLImx9cfYREf5P9Y0IVz9N7YNq55LVV0AdG2xKTlXCTloCUb_JukHU$>
>    - D1a, D1b (Part 2): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C6xKX87w2LtN4Is0mehuRgc1GqjKmbbhT14KbvUH5Sw/edit?usp=sharing
>    [docs.google.com]
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1C6xKX87w2LtN4Is0mehuRgc1GqjKmbbhT14KbvUH5Sw/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!9apinQkY_iIwAnFoEIkZCcq0k1jHxDLImx9cfYREf5P9Y0IVz9N7YNq55LVV0AdG2xKTlXCTloCUTR1PbqA$>
>
> Both documents are also posted on the wiki page here:
> https://community.icann.org/x/XwyHCg.
>
>
>
> Following the agreed format, the draft outcome language includes the
> following components:
>
>    - Brief answer to the charter question
>    - Recommendations and implementation guidance
>    - Rationale for recommendations and implementation guidance
>
> Please note that for charter question D1b Part 1 (related to the process
> by which an existing TLD registry operator seeks to activate variants)
> has not be addressed; it depends on the survey responses from the
> Arabic/Chinese TLD ROs.
>
>
>
> Please provide any input/suggestion for the draft outcome language on the *mailing
> list* by *Friday,** 8 July*.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Steve, Emily, Ariel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-idn-team
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-idn-team/attachments/20220708/6ded2cc7/attachment-0001.html>