[Gnso-epdp-idn-team] 回复: [Ext] Re: IDN Table Presentation - 11 May

Nigel Hickson nigel.hickson at dcms.gov.uk
Wed May 10 11:09:58 UTC 2023


Zuan cc as above

Good afternoon and thank you so much for sharing this;

best

Nigel

On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 07:30, Zhang Zuan <zuanzhangpetergreen at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ariel and all,
>
>
>
> Apology for the belated response.
>
>
>
> The Chinese community uses CDNC table, which was developed by CDNC, i.e.
> the Chinese Domain Name Consortium, an independent non-profit organization,
> jointly founded in May 2000 by CNNIC, HKIRC, MONIC and TWNIC, the four NICs
> of China’s Mainland, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.
>
>
>
> Before the CDNC was founded, there were organizations and companies who
> conducted research on Chinese domain name solutions and used different
> tables.
>
>
>
> The aim and mission of CDNC is to coordinate and develop a consistent
> Chinese table based on RFCs related to Chinese domain names.
>
>
>
> The CDNC table includes Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese and
> variants (of Simplified and Traditional Chinese). The table uses the RFC
> 3743-defined format, and is in compliance with the ICANN Guidelines for IDN
> registration and for publication in the IANA. Only the code points in the
> table can be open for registration.
>
>
>
> To update the CDNC table, any CDNC member is required to submit an
> application to the CDNC Secretary first. The CDNC Secretary refers it to an
> Expert Panel to evaluate the application. If approved, the CDNC Secretary
> would solicit comments of CDNC members. Finally, the Board of CDNC shall
> have a review of the application. If all is approved, the application shall
> be effective and the CDNC table would be updated.
>
>
>
> Hope the above information is of any help.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Zuan
> ------------------------------
> *发件人:* Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> *发送时间:* 2023年5月10日 7:43
> *收件人:* Michael Bauland <Michael.Bauland at knipp.de>; Tan Tanaka, Dennis <
> dtantanaka at verisign.com>; m.alzoba at gmail.com <m.alzoba at gmail.com>;
> zuanzhangpetergreen at hotmail.com <zuanzhangpetergreen at hotmail.com>
> *抄送:* Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>; Emily Barabas <
> emily.barabas at icann.org>
> *主题:* Re: [Ext] Re: IDN Table Presentation - 11 May
>
> Hello all  (and particularly Michael and Dennis),
>
> As promised, welcome your input for the proposed slide deck ahead of the
> call, if possible. I understand time is rather limited, but if there is any
> blatant inaccuracy, especially on slide 8, I would appreciate your comment!
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WhHBPGuxEsHU2hPN3HuQaa14rJCNMywwSG4WdMC4yYI/edit#slide=id.g24155cc58c9_0_16
>
> Thank you,
> Ariel
>
>
> On 5/9/23, 2:55 PM, "Ariel Liang" <ariel.liang at icann.org> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for the information you shared, Michael. I think I understand
> more now, and will definitely appreciate that you share the harmonization
> practice you are familiar with, so the group can gain better understanding
> when deliberating on the questions.
>
>     I will work on a slide that lists the gist, and will welcome your
> input!
>
>     Best Regards,
>     Ariel
>
>     On 5/8/23, 6:02 AM, "Michael Bauland" <Michael.Bauland at knipp.de>
> wrote:
>
>         Hi Ariel,
>
>         On 05.05.2023 19:58, Ariel Liang wrote:
>         > Hello Michael,
>         >
>         > Thanks for the explanation. So basically the "canonical form" is
> not exactly "primary", but an arbitrary designation by the registries based
> on the code point of the variant label? You mentioned that the canonical
> code point may not be allowed in a IDN table, what does it mean?
>
>         This just means that the canonical code point may be a code point
> that
>         is not among the list of code points for that IDN table.
>         Take for example a Cyrillic IDN table that of course does not
> allow any
>         Latin characters.
>         That table then has the allowed code point
>         U+0430 (CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A)
>         The canonical code point would be
>         U+0061 (LATIN SMALL LETTER A).
>
>         So the canonical code point for U+0430 is a code point that is not
>         allowed according to its IDN table. It's nevertheless used to
> calculate
>         the canonical form of a label (which can even become a
> mixed-script
>         label, but that's no problem, because it's only an internal
>         representation used for variant checks).
>
>         >
>         > I think this is the type of information that Donna/Justine hope
> you and others from registries and registrars could share with the EPDP
> Team, with regard to how IDN tables are used when someone attempts to
> register an IDN label at the second-level. We recall you offered to do a
> small presentation of how Tango (?) implements IDNs at the second-level.
> Would this presentation that you offered to do be relevant to our
> discussion of the IDN table harmonization and format?
>
>         As I mentioned last week, I found a problem in our internal
>         harmonisation process. With our current tables it's just a
> theoretical
>         problem, but still it's there. Therefore I'm not sure if it's
> helpful,
>         that I present how we are dealing with harmonisation, if it's not
>         working in all cases.
>
>         If you still think it's helpful, I can say a few words of what
> we're doing.
>
>         Cheers,
>
>         Michael
>
>
>         --
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
>               |       |
>               | knipp |            Knipp  Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
>                -------                    Technologiepark
>                                           Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9
>                                           44227 Dortmund
>                                           Germany
>
>               Dipl.-Informatiker          Fon:    +49 231 9703-0
>                                           Fax:    +49 231 9703-200
>               Dr. Michael Bauland         SIP:    Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
>               Software Development        E-mail: Michael.Bauland at knipp.de
>
>                                           Register Court:
>                                           Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728
>
>                                           Chief Executive Officers:
>                                           Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-idn-team
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-idn-team/attachments/20230510/33829ae6/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list