[Gnso-epdp-legal] Proposed agenda: Legal Committee Meeting #11 - Tuesday, 3 December

[Caitlin Tubergen]

Dear EPDP Legal Committee:

 

Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow’s Legal Committee meeting. 

 

As a reminder, please come prepared to the meeting having completed the below action items:

 
Thomas to add a footnote to Q11, scenario 1, inquiring whether the outlined approach is unnecessarily conservative by Friday, 22 November. 
Legal Committee to review the recently-published Guidelines on Territorial Scope from the European Data Protection Board. Following review of the guidelines, Legal Committee members who believe this warrants further discussion to outline the outstanding issue(s) to the list.
Matthew to clarify in the executive summary for questions 1/2, specifically noting that the Team is summarizing the advice Bird & Bird returned based on the specific scenarios provided to them by Wednesday, 20 November. 
Matthew to edit the executive summary for question 3, taking into account the discussion of legal effect by Wednesday, 20 November.
Brian to propose a new WHOIS accuracy question, regarding the significant effects of processing WHOIS data vs. the effort taken to ensure its accuracy by Tuesday, 26 November. 
Laureen to review GAC-proposed questions for WHOIS accuracy and provide a rationale within the appropriate column in the worksheet.
In advance of the next call on Tuesday, 3 December, Legal Committee to review Priority 2 questions for all remaining topics (all but WHOIS accuracy and City Field Redaction) submitted by their SO/AC/SG and determine whether or not they remain relevant and, if so, draft a short rationale in the respective worksheet. Please find a link to the Priority 2 Worksheets. Please note that within each worksheet, Support Staff has indicated who is responsible for adding a rationale to each question. 
 

Best regards,

 

Marika, Berry, and Caitlin

 

--

Legal Committee Meeting #11

Tuesday, 3 December 2019

 
Roll Call & SOI Updates 
 
Continued Substantive Review of Priority 1 (SSAD) Legal Questions Submitted to Date
 

a)      Substantive review of SSAD questions (beginning where LC left off during last LC meeting)

 

·         Updated Question 11

o    Team to review Brian, Margie, Thomas, and Volker’s updated proposal for Q11. 

 

·         Updated Google Right to be Forgotten Question

o    Following the Team’s review of the Google Right to be Forgotten case, does the Committee believe a question to outside counsel is necessary?

 

b)      Agree on next steps

  

 
Continue review of Priority 2 Legal Questions – WHOIS Accuracy and City Field Redaction
a)        Substantive review of Priority 2 Legal Questions:
Display of Information of Information of Affiliated vs. Accredited Privacy/Proxy Providers
Feasibility of Unique Contacts to have a Uniform Anonymized Email address
Legal vs. Natural
Potential OCTO Purpose
b)      Agree on next steps

 
Wrap and confirm next meeting to be scheduled 
a)      Confirm action items

b)      The next Legal Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, 17 December at 15:00 UTC.

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-legal/attachments/20191202/38fd60d6/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4620 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-legal/attachments/20191202/38fd60d6/smime-0001.p7s>