[Gnso-epdp-legal] Revised Question on Territorial Scope

King, Brian Brian.King at markmonitor.com
Tue Jan 7 20:54:34 UTC 2020


Hi Team,

Margie and I reviewed the question we discussed this morning per our homework assignment, and we respectfully submit the below revised question below for your consideration. Since we agreed on #1 and #2 this morning, only #3 has been changed.

Rewritten Question:
In light of the Right to Be Forgotten Case regarding the reach of GDPR, and the recent guidelines published by the EDPB on Geographic Scope<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__edpb.europa.eu_sites_edpb_files_files_file1_edpb-5Fguidelines-5F3-5F2018-5Fterritorial-5Fscope-5Fafter-5Fpublic-5Fconsultation-5Fen.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=OGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw&r=qQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA&m=VH1lTBbXRHuGBzmHv6MDdFMGJFp4rxC3HNks7yXp8Ag&s=Wm0q2xFIYFO65E1T_FPWz5HfiNnV_iNT5JBbHTsyVQM&e=>,
Does this ruling and the Guidelines affect:

  1.  The advice given in Phase 1 Regarding Territorial Scope<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fcommunity.icann.org-252Fdownload-252Fattachments-252F102138857-252FICANN-252520-2D-252520Memo-252520on-252520Territorial-252520Scope-252520.docx-253Fversion-253D1-2526modificationDate-253D1552176561000-2526api-253Dv2-26data-3D02-257C01-257CMarksv-2540microsoft.com-257C0fc10369b86b4fb54cdb08d745d81ad8-257C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47-257C1-257C1-257C637054666773951714-26sdata-3D85hB3n-252BgHO5zltdzTm5Pmd-252FUeu0T7OL-252F4bywkCcb7dg-253D-26reserved-3D0%26d%3DDwMGaQ%26c%3DOGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw%26r%3DqQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA%26m%3DqgqaikAoSyJzElcg7C-u09feQBWajzhT1JT2LBv05jg%26s%3D8TCbK69KiXCKrPpNO-KL9rKcsRkCISjzvCof8uKQBRs%26e%3D&data=02%7C01%7CMarksv%40microsoft.com%7C2925832daae546b63e0408d745f74dba%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637054800792839937&sdata=exadgrNqqCKVQ%2FLTBKZXXJMnBkfDjA9SNSTaJuX%2FH4Q%3D&reserved=0>, in Sections 4.2 or 6.2- 6.9?
  2.  The advice given in Q1-2 with respect to liability (Section 4 of the memo)?
  3.  In light of this ECJ decision and the Geographic Scope Guidelines<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__edpb.europa.eu_sites_edpb_files_files_file1_edpb-5Fguidelines-5F3-5F2018-5Fterritorial-5Fscope-5Fafter-5Fpublic-5Fconsultation-5Fen.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=OGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw&r=qQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA&m=VH1lTBbXRHuGBzmHv6MDdFMGJFp4rxC3HNks7yXp8Ag&s=Wm0q2xFIYFO65E1T_FPWz5HfiNnV_iNT5JBbHTsyVQM&e=>, using the same assumptions identified for Q1 and Q2, would there be less risk to EEA-based contracted parties if:

  1.  an SSAD operated by ICANN (as opposed to the EEA-based contracted party) based in ICANN's Los Angeles Headquarters allowed automated disclosure responses for redacted data of registrants located outside of the EU, for legitimate purposes (such as cybersecurity investigations and mitigation) and/or other fundamental rights such as intellectual property infringement investigations (See EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Article 17, Section 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Feur-2Dlex.europa.eu-252Flegal-2Dcontent-252FEN-252FTXT-252F-253Furi-253DCELEX-253A12012P-252FTXT-26data-3D02-257C01-257CMarksv-2540microsoft.com-257C2925832daae546b63e0408d745f74dba-257C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47-257C1-257C1-257C637054800792819948-26sdata-3DRxgqL9eYdRavnaFqIDjzDOT4GPHJRSsmQ1-252Favz10vKw-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=VLG2NlF9SKlO5Br01dwddo_lA4oncgv7PkSSSsw8ZV4&s=fPD2dxvOeBSKNBXQT0rUNkNPmaova0kNQcFCii_4G6Y&e=>)


Brian J. King
Director of Internet Policy and Industry Affairs

T +1 443 761 3726
markmonitor.com<http://www.markmonitor.com>

MarkMonitor
Protecting companies and consumers in a digital world

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-legal/attachments/20200107/c4b6bbf4/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-epdp-legal mailing list