[Gnso-epdp-legal] Revised Question on Territorial Scope

Becky Burr becky.burr at board.icann.org
Tue Jan 7 21:44:57 UTC 2020


thanks Brian and Margie.  All, please review this revised question 3 and
respond by email with agreement, suggestions, or objections.

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:54 PM King, Brian via Gnso-epdp-legal <
gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> Margie and I reviewed the question we discussed this morning per our
> homework assignment, and we respectfully submit the below revised question
> below for your consideration. Since we agreed on #1 and #2 this morning,
> only #3 has been changed.
>
>
>
> Rewritten Question:
>
> In light of the Right to Be Forgotten Case regarding the reach of GDPR,
> and the recent guidelines published by the EDPB on Geographic Scope
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__edpb.europa.eu_sites_edpb_files_files_file1_edpb-5Fguidelines-5F3-5F2018-5Fterritorial-5Fscope-5Fafter-5Fpublic-5Fconsultation-5Fen.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=OGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw&r=qQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA&m=VH1lTBbXRHuGBzmHv6MDdFMGJFp4rxC3HNks7yXp8Ag&s=Wm0q2xFIYFO65E1T_FPWz5HfiNnV_iNT5JBbHTsyVQM&e=>
> ,
>
> Does this ruling and the Guidelines affect:
>
>    1. The advice given in Phase 1 Regarding Territorial Scope
>    <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fcommunity.icann.org-252Fdownload-252Fattachments-252F102138857-252FICANN-252520-2D-252520Memo-252520on-252520Territorial-252520Scope-252520.docx-253Fversion-253D1-2526modificationDate-253D1552176561000-2526api-253Dv2-26data-3D02-257C01-257CMarksv-2540microsoft.com-257C0fc10369b86b4fb54cdb08d745d81ad8-257C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47-257C1-257C1-257C637054666773951714-26sdata-3D85hB3n-252BgHO5zltdzTm5Pmd-252FUeu0T7OL-252F4bywkCcb7dg-253D-26reserved-3D0%26d%3DDwMGaQ%26c%3DOGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw%26r%3DqQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA%26m%3DqgqaikAoSyJzElcg7C-u09feQBWajzhT1JT2LBv05jg%26s%3D8TCbK69KiXCKrPpNO-KL9rKcsRkCISjzvCof8uKQBRs%26e%3D&data=02%7C01%7CMarksv%40microsoft.com%7C2925832daae546b63e0408d745f74dba%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637054800792839937&sdata=exadgrNqqCKVQ%2FLTBKZXXJMnBkfDjA9SNSTaJuX%2FH4Q%3D&reserved=0>,
>    in Sections 4.2 or 6.2- 6.9?
>    2. The advice given in Q1-2 with respect to liability (Section 4 of
>    the memo)?
>    3. In light of this ECJ decision and the Geographic Scope Guidelines
>    <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__edpb.europa.eu_sites_edpb_files_files_file1_edpb-5Fguidelines-5F3-5F2018-5Fterritorial-5Fscope-5Fafter-5Fpublic-5Fconsultation-5Fen.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=OGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw&r=qQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA&m=VH1lTBbXRHuGBzmHv6MDdFMGJFp4rxC3HNks7yXp8Ag&s=Wm0q2xFIYFO65E1T_FPWz5HfiNnV_iNT5JBbHTsyVQM&e=>,
>    using the same assumptions identified for Q1 and Q2, would there be less
>    risk to EEA-based contracted parties if:
>
>
>    1. an SSAD operated by ICANN (as opposed to the EEA-based contracted
>    party) based in ICANN’s Los Angeles Headquarters allowed automated
>    disclosure responses for redacted data of registrants located outside of
>    the EU, for legitimate purposes (such as cybersecurity investigations and
>    mitigation) and/or other fundamental rights such as intellectual
>    property infringement investigations (See EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
>    Article 17, Section 2
>    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT
>    <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Feur-2Dlex.europa.eu-252Flegal-2Dcontent-252FEN-252FTXT-252F-253Furi-253DCELEX-253A12012P-252FTXT-26data-3D02-257C01-257CMarksv-2540microsoft.com-257C2925832daae546b63e0408d745f74dba-257C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47-257C1-257C1-257C637054800792819948-26sdata-3DRxgqL9eYdRavnaFqIDjzDOT4GPHJRSsmQ1-252Favz10vKw-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=VLG2NlF9SKlO5Br01dwddo_lA4oncgv7PkSSSsw8ZV4&s=fPD2dxvOeBSKNBXQT0rUNkNPmaova0kNQcFCii_4G6Y&e=>
>    )
>
>
>
>
>
> *Brian J. King *
> Director of Internet Policy and Industry Affairs
>
>
>
> T +1 443 761 3726
> * markmonitor.com <http://www.markmonitor.com>*
>
>
>
>
> *MarkMonitor *Protecting companies and consumers in a digital world
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-legal mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-legal
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-legal/attachments/20200107/00e77835/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-epdp-legal mailing list