[Gnso-epdp-legal] For Legal Committee Review: Consolidated Legal v. Natural questions

[Becky Burr]

Thank you Melina.  As an initial matter, I am reluctant to introduce
entirely new questions into the mix at this point, given the fact that our
work is a dependency for the work of the plenary.  I propose that we
consider your additional questions after we have finished our work on all
of the questions in the original pipeline.

Meanwhile, I'm not sure I follow your question.  You ask about a tiered
approach:


   1. distinguish between legal and natural person registrations initially
   and publish nothing associated with a natural person registration
   2. look at the data associated with a legal person registration and
   publish only non-personal data,
   3. Give legal persons the opportunity to publish

Why would we need legal advice with respect to this question?  If I have
understood the approach you suggest, it seems to me that (i) it would be
entirely legal under GDPR and (ii) implementation issues (e.g., related to
consent, etc.) are addressed in the other questions we are asking.  Could
you clarify this issue for the group i*n a separate email and not in the
doc*?

Also, in order to make suggestions in Docs, there is a drop-down tab in the
upper right hand of the bar - you should set the tab to "suggesting mode"
in order to make suggested edits for the group's consideration.

Best,
Becky

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:04 AM STROUNGI Melina via Gnso-epdp-legal <
gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear EPDP colleagues,
>
>
>
> Just to let you know that I introduced an edit (in highlight as for some
> reason track changes seem to be disabled).
>
>
>
> As I did not want to alter the substance of the questions already raised I
> preferred to raise this question separately (it is the same question I
> raised during our meetings and there was no objection from anyone; nor do I
> see a harm in asking. On the contrary, it could help clarify).
>
>
>
> Hope this is fine.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CqczmN_ShkDFgx05q8AyUX5iDM2u5dul/edit
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Melina
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-epdp-legal <gnso-epdp-legal-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of
> *Caitlin Tubergen via Gnso-epdp-legal
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 3, 2021 2:57 PM
> *To:* gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-epdp-legal] For Legal Committee Review: Consolidated
> Legal v. Natural questions
>
>
>
> Apologies for the additional email. Please use this link for the
> consolidated L v. N questions:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CqczmN_ShkDFgx05q8AyUX5iDM2u5dul/edit
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1CqczmN_ShkDFgx05q8AyUX5iDM2u5dul/edit__;!!DOxrgLBm!VcPhj64uakuaQONjMPhe-OyqzVETty3sUZwbmj75w7rOLZapBWB0EiH21aVQ-BV5H3dONavb$>
> .
>
>
>
> As noted below, please respond no later than COB on Friday 5 March if you
> strongly object to the revised questions.  Absent reasoned objection, we
> will notify the plenary of our intent to submit those questions to B&B.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Berry, Marika, and Caitlin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 9:55 PM
> *To: *"gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org>
> *Subject: *For Legal Committee Review: Consolidated Legal v. Natural
> questions
>
>
>
> Sent on behalf of Becky Burr:
>
>
>
> Dear ePDP Legal Team colleagues:
>
>
>
> As promised, please find modest revisions to Questions 1-6 relating to
> Legal/Natural Person issues following our discussion today:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16SQJ3dfUuVKZJOQrKnBFqkUwmqIpQjCG/edit#
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/16SQJ3dfUuVKZJOQrKnBFqkUwmqIpQjCG/edit__;!!DOxrgLBm!VcPhj64uakuaQONjMPhe-OyqzVETty3sUZwbmj75w7rOLZapBWB0EiH21aVQ-BV5H4W4zdXh$>
> .
>
>
>
> With respect to reformatted questions 1 - 3, covering original questions
> 1-4, please respond no later than COB on Friday 5 March if you strongly
> object to the revised questions.  Absent reasoned objection, we will notify
> the plenary of our intent to submit those questions to B&B.
>
>
>
> With respect to the reformatted question on EURid/RIPE-NCC, you will see
> that I have retained the background material on EURid and Article 16.
> Please review and submit any comments by COB on Friday 5 March in
> preparation for a brief decisional conversation on Tuesday.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Becky
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-legal mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-legal
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-legal/attachments/20210305/55ab3060/attachment-0001.html>