[Gnso-epdp-team] Welcome - EPDP on the Temporary Specification for Registration Data

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi Kurt and all,

I have a couple of questions about your proposal to hold only one public comment period on the output of this EPDP Team:

1. Is the decision to eliminate the public comment period prior to a Board vote to adopt GNSO recommendations a decision we can make? Doesn’t the Board need to make this decision?
2. Isn’t there a provision in the RA that allows Registry Operators to provide notice to ICANN before the end of this public comment period, if they believe that a proposed Consensus Policy may be in violation of applicable law? Is this a consideration that needs to be taken into account?

Thanks.

Amr

> On Jul 31, 2018, at 12:53 AM, Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear All:
> 
> I am honored to be named chair of this EPDP team. I know many of you well and look forward to working with all of you. 
> 
> I’ve attached some thoughts about the operation of our team. These suggestions are intended to increase our effectiveness and facilitate the building of consensus. I appreciate your comments on any or all of them, either during the meeting or offline. 
> 
> The attached outline tracks to the meeting agenda, which is being sent out simultaneously with this email. If you have questions about the agenda items, please check the document attached here for some degree of explanation. 
> 
> Our first meeting (1 Aug 14:00UTC) will concern mainly process issues but I have reserved some time at the end for substantive discussion as we should get started in some small way.
> 
> I look forward to seeing you all on Wednesday. 
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Kurt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team<Welcome to the PDP .pdf>