[Gnso-epdp-team] FW: Questions for ICANN Org from EPDP Team Meeting - 9 August 2018

[Alex Deacon]

Hi Milton.

The following link worked for me

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-20aug18-en.pdf

Alex


On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:36 PM Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:

> Marika and other ICANN staff:
>
> Thanks very much for this rapidly-supplied and useful information.
>
> I did notice, however, that the link to the Draft Framework for a
> Possible Unified Access Model for Continued Access to Full WHOIS Data – For
> Discussion
> <http://Draft%20Framework%20for%20a%20Possible%20Unified%20Access%20Model%20for%20Continued%20Access%20to%20Full%20WHOIS%20Data%20–%20For%20Discussion>
> does not work.
>
> I went to the
> https://community.icann.org/display/EOTSFGRD/Input+from+ICANN+Org page
> and the link didn’t work there, either. If you could supply the proper link
> I’d appreciate it.
>
>
>
> --MM
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 28, 2018 11:30 AM
> *To:* Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-epdp-team] FW: Questions for ICANN Org from EPDP Team
> Meeting - 9 August 2018
>
>
>
> For your information. The responses to these questions will be posted on
> the related wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/ahppBQ.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>
>
>
> *From: *Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, August 28, 2018 at 09:12
> *To: *Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, Daniel Halloran <
> daniel.halloran at icann.org>, Erika Randall <erika.randall at icann.org>
> *Cc: *Berry Cobb <Berry.Cobb at icann.org>, Caitlin Tubergen <
> caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Questions for ICANN Org from EPDP Team Meeting - 9 August
> 2018
>
>
>
> Hi Marika,
>
>
>
> Please see below responses to the question from the 21 August meeting.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Trang
>
>
>
> **
>
>
>
> QUESTION: Can an update be provided on the status of the reconfirmation
> of the Temporary Specification by the ICANN Board? Response: There is a
> board meeting planned for later today (21 August). No changes to the
> Temporary Specification are being proposed.
>
>
>
> RESPONSE: The Board reaffirmed
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2018-08-21-en>
> the Temporary Specification with no changes on 21 August 2018.
>
>
>
> QUESTION: Has the WHOIS Conflicts with local laws procedure been used and
> successfully used to date? Please indicate the instances where the
> procedure was invoked and the outcome. Were any specific issues identified
> with the use of this procedure?
>
>
>
> RESPONSE: The procedure was most recently invoked for .FRL in late 2017.
> However, the request was withdrawn prior to an outcome when .FRL agreed to
> comply with the requirements of the Temporary Specification. The request
> was withdrawn early on in the process so ICANN org had not conducted a
> formal review to identify specific issues with the procedure.
>
> The procedure was also previously attempted by .FRL in late 2016 but the
> request did not meet the requirements to utilize the procedure. At the
> time, requirement to trigger the procedure was that the contracted party
> must have received “notification of an investigation, litigation,
> regulatory proceeding or other government or civil action that might affect
> its compliance.” However, .FRL was not subject to any such proceeding at
> the time, and the procedure could not be used.
>
>
>
> QUESTION: Regarding data disclosures concerning LEA requests: does GDPR
> compel a report of those disclosures to be made to the data subject? Please
> provide analysis of “in-jurisdiction” and “out-of-jurisdiction” requests.
>
>
>
> RESPONSE: The latest Draft Framework for a Possible Unified Access Model
> for Continued Access to Full WHOIS Data – For Discussion
> <http://Draft%20Framework%20for%20a%20Possible%20Unified%20Access%20Model%20for%20Continued%20Access%20to%20Full%20WHOIS%20Data%20–%20For%20Discussion>
> addresses the question of “whether or not logs of query activities
> concerning non-public data must be available to the registrant upon request
> except if prohibited by a relevant court order or legal requirement.”
> Please refer to Section 8 of the draft framework for more information on
> this topic. The draft framework is published for community discussion and
> to seek guidance from the European Data Protection Board. With a better
> understanding of the law, we will all be well positioned to develop,
> implement and enforce a legally sound, consistent unified model for access
> to non-public registration data, and lower the risk for the contracted
> parties in order for them to be able to accept such model.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team



-- 
___________
*Alex Deacon*
Cole Valley Consulting
alex at colevalleyconsulting.com
+1.415.488.6009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20180828/93b0727b/attachment.html>