[Gnso-epdp-team] Slicing and dicing
epdp at gdpr.ninja
Thu Aug 30 02:55:38 UTC 2018
exactly. Thanks for helping me make my point. I wanted to come up with two examples - one clearly unacceptable and one likely acceptable for all. The unacceptable one being the one you mentioned. Yet, both could theoretically fall under 4.4.8 as 4.4.8 does not have limitations in it. Therefore we have to work on defining better what 4.4.8 shall encompass and what not.
> Am 30.08.2018 um 00:11 schrieb Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>:
> Thomas, if we are going to have a productive discussion, let's keep this realistic. Payment data has never been a part of WHOIS and is a complete red herring here.
> At 29/08/2018 05:20 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
>> If the purpose included the publication of all data of potential cybersquatters, including their payment data to allow for investigators to do their work efficiently, I think we would all agree that that would go too far. Yet, one could think that such action was covered by the purpose of 4.4.8..
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team