[Gnso-epdp-team] Legal vs Natural and Redactions

[Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi]

Marika,

On Legal vs Natural, you can definitely say that the ALAC supports 
making the distinction mandatory.

In the sentence "They further are of the view that this critical 
issue falls squarely within the scope of the EPDP, as it is already 
addressed in the Temporary Specification.", "is already addressed" is 
somewhat misleading as it might be construed to imply that the Temp 
Spec already requires the distinction. However, the Temp Spec does 
reference the issue in "Annex: Important Issues for Further Community 
Action" and the EPDP Charter explicitly asks whether the distinction 
should be required so there is no question the issue is within scope.

On redactions, the ALAC supports the proposal that Rec #3, redactions 
only apply to registrants who are natural persons where anonymized 
e-mail addresses or a web form be provided, and that for legal 
persons, the original addresses be provided. This is in line with the 
EDPB letter of 05 July. In fact, the letter goes further in that it 
is not restricted to legal persons and says that all registrants 
could use non-personal e-mail address which would therefore not need 
to be anonymized.

Hadia on behalf of myself and Alan