[Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Revised Rec. 21
trang.nguyen at icann.org
Tue Nov 20 00:31:49 UTC 2018
Dear Kristina and EPDP Team,
Thank you for the revised recommendation 21 language. ICANN org suggests that the EPDP Team consider removing the word “the” from the language “…ICANN Org enters into the required agreements…” This word presupposes that ICANN must enter into an agreement with every entity “involved in registration data processing” when it has not been determined who all the parties involved in registration data processing are and whether an agreement will be required in all cases. For example, as mentioned this morning, some data escrow providers believe that they are controllers.
Dan and Trang
ICANN org liaisons
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Rosette, Kristina via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Reply-To: "Rosette, Kristina" <rosettek at amazon.com>
Date: Monday, November 19, 2018 at 8:51 AM
To: "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Revised Rec. 21
Thomas and I developed proposed revised Rec. 21 language. I posted it in chat, but copy it below for convenience:
Rec. 21: The EPDP Team recommends that ICANN Org enters into the required agreements such as a Data Processing Agreement (GDPR Art. 28) or Joint Controller Agreement (Art. 26), as appropriate, with the non-Contracted Party entities involved in registration data processing such as data escrow providers and EBERO providers. These agreements are expected to set out the relationship obligations and instructions for data processing between the different parties.
Senior Corporate Counsel, IP – Domains
rosettek at amazon.com<mailto:rosettek at amazon.com> | 703.407.1354
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team