[Gnso-epdp-team] [Ntfy-gnso-epdp-team] ***UPDATED DOODLE LINK*** Face to face meeting poll on behalf of Kurt Pritz
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Oct 31 15:31:46 UTC 2018
From legal point of view ,no meeting to be held in a country which directly or I directly put general BAN on the nationals of other countries
Thus is nit a matter tone out to the doodle
It is the principle of universality,inclusduvebess, transparency, non discriminative and democratic actions
One can not put the rights if millions of peoples of banned countries to the vote of others which has no interest on that right
You would be questioned to reply
To any inappropriate action and mismanagement of this super critical and top delicate legal issue
Pls exclude USA from the list of doodle .
Distinguished chair of GAC is requested to defend my very legitimate right
I was excluded once but strongly object to be excluded again
Sent from my iPhone
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 15:34, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
> Dear Kavouss,
> Please find below the link to the doodle poll for you to complete. You should have received this email from the ntfy-gnso-epdp-team at icann.org address.
> Best regards,
> From: Ntfy-gnso-epdp-team <ntfy-gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter at icann.org>
> Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 6:09 AM
> To: "ntfy-gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <ntfy-gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
> Subject: [Ntfy-gnso-epdp-team] ***UPDATED DOODLE LINK*** Face to face meeting poll on behalf of Kurt Pritz
> Hi everyone:
> Please complete the following doodle poll to help determine the best dates for our next face-to-face meeting: https://doodle.com/poll/yad2rwnncrvi7hd9 [doodle.com]. A face-to-face meeting, if held, will last three full days.
> Given the response to the last letter on this topic, it is more likely than not that the meeting will be held in January. However, if stock-taking over the next few days (including a review of the draft initial report) indicates that at face-to-face meeting is required sooner in order to ensure a timely conclusion to our work, we have included December dates to determine availability. Otherwise, a January meeting seems better timed for review of public comment. (I am not convinced a face-to-face meeting for review of public comment is necessary but will know better when the methodology for reviving and reviewing public comment in our case is developed.)
> Please respond with your availability and without regard to your preference / opinion for a meeting time as to do otherwise would skew the results and unfairly disadvantage others.
> For your information, if the meeting is to be held in December, it is likely to occur in Brussels. If it is held in January, it might be held in North or Central America, or Europe - wherever total costs are lowest.
> Please respond within 48 hours. The meeting time will be based on:
> The state and needs of our work
> The availability of the greatest percentage of our members (excluding alternates)
> In cases of clashes with other ICANN meetings, I think this EPDP work takes precedence. (some of these dates may conflict with national and/or religious holidays, if so, please point this out in the comments to the doodle poll).
> Best regards,
> Kurt Pritz
> Ntfy-gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Ntfy-gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team