[Gnso-epdp-team] RrSG edits -- Section 4.4
James M. Bladel
jbladel at godaddy.com
Thu Sep 6 02:32:34 UTC 2018
Thank you, Stephanie. Let’s discuss on the next call, but I think our key point is that risk/exposure cannot be decoupled from some degree of judgement.
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 5:37:42 PM
To: gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] RrSG edits -- Section 4.4
I think these are good edits. One small point in the last part dealing with non-binding arbitration....I would suggest that you should say "the registrar's interpretation of the law takes precedence", as each side will inevitably have its own interpretation of the law, but only one side is going to get the fine....
On 2018-09-05 19:42, James M. Bladel wrote:
ePDP Team –
In preparation for tomorrow’s call, please find attached a redline PDF of our edits to Section 4.4 of the Temp Spec, along with a slide/PDF with “clean” language for Kurt & Staff. Matt, Theo and I will walk through these edits, along with our rationale.
Look forward to our discussion tomorrow.
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team