[Gnso-epdp-team] Section 4.4.8

Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 08:23:54 UTC 2018

But that is your views which is respected
My view is different we  MUST mention law enforcement irrespective whether or not it included in the third party interest 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Sep 2018, at 03:24, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
> This is the problem you get into when you start listing specific legitimate interests. Someone will always come up with another suggestion. I think it is much better to leave those specifics off and use the general language. Surely law enforcement is a third party legitimate interest and will often have a legal basis.  But some times they will not have a legal basis. You can’t say categorically that a law enforcement agency ALWAYS has a right. Same goes for IPR.
> Milton L Mueller
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> Georgia Institute of Technology
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 13:19, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Alex,
>> Tks
>> What about law enforcement ?
>> Tks
>> Kavouss 
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:34 PM Alex Deacon <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> As you know a group of us has been working to recommend an update to Section 4.4.8 of the temp spec.  
>>> While we haven't come to full agreement on the update, we are pretty close and wanted to share the current/tentative output of the volunteer team with the broader team. 
>>> 4.4.8  Supporting a framework that enables identification of third-parties with legitimate interests grounded in legal bases, and providing these third-parties with access to Registration Data relevant to addressing specific issues involving domain name registrations related to consumer protection, investigation of cybercrime, DNS abuse and intellectual property protection. 
>>> The non-bold text was suggested by Amr/NCSG and the added bold text was an updated suggested by me/IPC and supported by the BC.  
>>> Giving it a re-read again today I think additional word-smithing could be warranted, but for now I will resist and step away and let others share their thoughts. 
>>> Alex
>>> -- 
>>> ___________
>>> Alex Deacon
>>> Cole Valley Consulting
>>> alex at colevalleyconsulting.com
>>> +1.415.488.6009
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
>>> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
>> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20180913/daad03d2/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Gnso-epdp-team mailing list