[Gnso-epdp-team] CPH Response to Draft Initial Report
karklinsj at gmail.com
Wed Dec 4 11:03:08 UTC 2019
Good morning Matthew,
Thank you for sharing the CPH initial reaction to the draft Initial Report.
My push behind the proposed deadline of publishing the Initial Report is to
respond to expectations of wider ICANN community. Your proposed Interim
Status Report does not contribute to the goal of advancing the time of
publication of the Final Report before the June ICANN meeting. Therefore, I
don't see added value to such publication. This is not required by
operational procedures of PDPs.
I acknowledge that there are still some unresolved issues therefore I
propose options at this stage, hoping that clarity will be provided prior
the publication of the Final Report.
If more time is needed before putting out the Initial Report on Dec 12,
maybe we can think of a marathon Team call on Saturday, Dec 7. If we would
spend extra 6-8 hours, maybe we could get on the same page. I understand
agressivity of my proposal, but pls consider prior the call later today.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:40 PM Crossman, Matthew via Gnso-epdp-team <
gnso-epdp-team at icann.org> wrote:
> EPDP Team,
> Attached is the CPH response to the draft Initial Report. We look forward
> to discussing further on our call tomorrow.
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team