[Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Consensus Call #2

[Ayden Férdeline]

Hi Kurt,

In the fourth column on page 2 (Recommendation 2), in the third paragraph it states "citation required." Can we please see the final text, inclusive of citations? Thank you.

Kind regards,

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, February 4, 2019 10:54 PM, Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com> wrote:

> Hi Everyone:
>
> I am trying to keep up with the comments on the list so am gaining an appreciation for the position of you members of the team. Thanks for your involvement and the tone in your emails - obviously trying to find a path to finishing each of these recommendations.
>
> Nonetheless, I am delivering the second set of Recommendations in this consensus call process.
>
> Please note that, given the recent discussion on the email list, I have moved three of the Recommendations out of “Bundle 2,” which includes those Recommendations where discussion is considered completed. These Recommendations are now in Bundle 3 and in blue font.
>
> The three sections are:
>
> The Purposes for Processing Registration Data:
>
> Purpose 1 - Establish the rights of a Registered Name Holder
> Purpose 2 - Maintaining SSR through enabling of lawful access
> Purpose 3 - Enable communication with RNH
> Purpose 4 - Safeguarding RNH's Registration Data
> Purpose 5 - Handling Contractual Compliance
> Purpose 6 - Resolution of DRPs
> Purpose 7 - gTLD registration policy eligibility criteria
>
> Recommendations considered completed in our earlier discussions:
>
> Recommendation #2 - Commitment to consider a system for Standardized Access to non-public Registration Data
> Recommendation #3 - Requirements related to accuracy
> Recommendation #15 - URS / UDRP
> Recommendation #16 - Instructions for RPM PDP WG
> Recommendation #18 - Data processing agreements with dispute resolution providers (incl. Question #4)
> Recommendation #19 - Transfer Policy
> Recommendation #20 - Input to Transfer Policy review (incl. Question #5)
> Recommendation #21 - Data processing agreements with non-Contracted Party entities involved in registration data processing
> Recommendation #6 - Escrow Providers
> New – Consent to publish additional information
>
> Recommendations in the process of being completed or where there is disagreement:
>
> Recommendation #9 - Organization field
> Recommendation #NEW - City Field
> Recommendation #10 - Email communication
> Recommendation #14 - Responsible parties
> Recommendation #4 - Data elements to be collected by Registrars (incl. Question #2)
> Recommendation #5 - Data elements to be transferred from Registrars to Registries
> Recommendation #New - Geographic Basis
> Recommendation #New - Natural vs. legal
> Recommendation #12 - Reasonable access
> Recommendation #NEW - Implementation Transition Period
> Recommendation #11 - Data retention
> Recommendation #22 - Impact on other policies
> Recommendation #NEW - Additional Purposes
> Recommendation #8 - Redaction
> Recommendation #13 - Controller Agreement
> Recommendation #7 - Contractual Compliance
>
> On this second set, please revert to me by the end of Thursday if you disagree with my assessment and if you will provide a statement for the final report. Remember that you can support a consensus position and still provide a statement.  If we can in someway extend these deadlines (and we are working to do that), I will let you know.
>
> Thank you for your attention on this and all else.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Kurt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190205/e31c765e/attachment.html>