[Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report

[Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi]

Hi again

Page 7 - footnote says  "for those data elements marked as "optional" these are optional for the RNH to provide

The Technical contact is addressed separately on page 8 where it says that it is optional for the registrar to provide

Hadia
________________________________________
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Hadia  Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia at tra.gov.eg>
Sent: 20 February 2019 12:40
To: Heineman, Ashley; GNSO EPDP
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report

Hi Ashley,


I noticed in your attachment that you refer to the organization field as optional for the registrar to provide, according to the current report registrars are required to offer the organization field to the registrants but it is optional for the registrants to fill it in. The organization field will be published if the registrant agrees to that otherwise it can either be redacted or deleted depending on what the registrar decides to do. However there is a phase in period for the registrars with no certain date. So this is not like the tech contact field which is optional for the registrars to provide and optional for the registrants to fill in.


Best

Hadia

________________________________
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Heineman, Ashley <AHeineman at ntia.doc.gov>
Sent: 20 February 2019 02:54
To: GNSO EPDP
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report

Dear Kurt,

Please find attached a statement for including in the phase 1 final report from the GAC small group.  FWIW - this does NOT represent an objection to the consensus calls or the report itself.

Thanks kindly,

Ashley Heineman



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team