[Gnso-epdp-team] Prioritization of F2F Topics Survey
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sat Jan 12 22:59:59 UTC 2019
I am fully in favor of established priority list but we must agree on that as such lust us not to be based on individual judgement
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13 Jan 2019, at 01:33, Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org> wrote:
> Dear All,
> In order to help inform the EPDP Team Leadership's development of the agenda for the F2F meeting in Toronto, each group may voluntarily rank the different purposes and recommendations below that are currently slated for EPDP Team review.
> Please find the link to the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GN7YN8X
> In prioritizing these topics, please consider the topics that both (1) MUST be addressed and resolved prior to the Team’s provision of its Final Report on the Temporary Specification, AND (2) should be discussed in a F2F manner, if possible. Topics not falling into the above may, for example, be handled outside of the F2F meeting in Team teleconferences or handled in Phase 2 of the Team’s work.
> This poll is intended to be informative and should not be construed as a vote on what will and what will not be on the agenda for the F2F meeting as that is a determination the leadership team will ultimately make. (Note: topics previously covered by the small teams have not been included in this survey, but you can call these out in the comment box if you believe any of the topics do require EPDP Team consideration during the F2F meeting.)
> If you choose to respond to the survey, please do so by COB Monday, 14 January.
> Thank you.
> Best regards,
> Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team