[Gnso-epdp-team] Recommendation 14 - Responsible Parties: email discussion
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 22:26:14 UTC 2019
Subject to further refinement of the text by other Team member, I found the
language you proposed a way forward to fix the problem and ready to
finalize the report
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:18 AM Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com> wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
> With the goal of progressing (even more) issues via email, the leadership
> team has considered the discussion during the most recent planary
> conference call and suggests the following language to capture the
> agreement in principle that was developed on Recommendation 14 (Responsible
> Based on the discussion of the EPDP meeting on 22 Jan 2019, the amendment
> below is proposed for EPDP Team consideration.
> *Initial Report Language*
> The EPDP Team recommends that the policy includes the following data
> processing activities as well as responsible parties: <See Initial Report
> *Plenary Discussion on this Issue*
> It was stated that the EPDP Team documented the data processing activities
> and responsible parties associated with gTLD registration data based upon
> data analysis and facts available at the time of the Phase I discussion.
> The EPDP Team acknowledged that, given the iterative nature between the
> development of GDPR-compliant agreements and the specification of data
> processing activities & responsible parties, whatever Recommendation is
> made at this time is likely to be affected by the completion of the
> necessary agreements, i.e., that contract development work would confirm
> and define the roles and responsibilities.
> *Proposed Updated Language:*
> During Phase 1 of its work, the EPDP Team documented the data processing
> activities and responsible parties associated with gTLD registration data. The
> EPDP Team, accordingly, recommends the inclusion of the data processing
> activities and responsible parties, outlined below, to be confirmed and
> documented in the relevant data processing agreements, noting, however,
> this Recommendation may be affected by the finalization of the necessary
> agreements (described elsewhere in this report) that would confirm and
> define the roles and responsibilities.
> Please indicate on the mailing list whether you have any concerns about
> these modifications and/or what other aspects of this recommendation should
> be discussed. If there are additional questions for ICANN Compliance that
> would serve to inform the deliberations on this recommendation, please
> share these also.
> Deadline: Monday, 28 January, additional email discussion might follow
> depending on responses.
> Best regards,
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team