[Gnso-epdp-team] CPH input on Face to Face planning

[Alan Greenberg]

Words ARE important, but having one person suggesting a change that gets made live in the doc, and then waiting 10 minutes to be called on to say it is not acceptable is poor use of time.

Alan

On January 26, 2020 12:38:49 PM EST, "King, Brian via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org> wrote:
We support this approach.

Perhaps it’s an occupational hazard of being an attorney and/or seeing enough IRTs in action, but policy words matter. One person’s perceived wordsmithing could be another person addressing a dealbreaker. With that said, we commit to avoiding unnecessary wordsmithing, and to using the tools and approach suggested by our CPH friends to make the most of our time together.

Brian J. King
Director of Internet Policy and Industry Affairs
MarkMonitor / Part of Clarivate Analytics
Phone: +1 (443) 761-3726
brian.king at markmonitor.com

On Jan 26, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:



Agreed.

Stephanie

On 2020-01-25 23:51, Alan Greenberg wrote:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20200126/b5b7038d/attachment-0001.html>