[Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the Community - clarification needed

[Kapin, Laureen]

In preparing for tomorrow's presentation, I realized that Question 5 to the Community omits an important word, "anonymized." We should correct this.

Here is the Question from the Initial Report:

EPDP Team Question for Community Input #5
Does this guidance as written provide sufficient information and resources to Registrars and Registry Operators who wish to publish a registrant- or registration-based email address? If not, what is missing and why?

Taken literally, this might leave the impression that the Recommendation is to publish a standard email address.  In fact, our deliberations involved the publication of an anonymized (or more precisely, pseudonymized) email address.  I request that we correct this oversight both so that our intention is clear and so that the public comments solicited focus on the real topic to consider - whether to publish some form of an anonymized email address.

I propose that we publish a corrected version of the Initial Report that inserts the word "anonymized" prior to "registrant- or registration-based email address" to correct this oversight.


Kind regards,
Laureen Kapin

Acting Assistant Director
Division of Consumer Response and Operations
Bureau of Consumer Protection
Federal Trade Commission

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20210615/551c6756/attachment.html>