[Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the Community - clarification needed

[Marika Konings]

Please also note that the preceding section in the Initial Report defines these terms (note, there are also some footnotes that go with these definitions):


  *   "Registrant-based email contact", means “an email for all domains registered by a unique registrant [sponsored by a given Registrar] OR [across Registrars], which is intended to be pseudonymous data when processed by non-contracted parties.
  *   "Registration-based email contact", means “a separate single use email for each domain name registered by a unique registrant, which is intended to be anonymous data when processed by non-contracted parties.



We can make sure that a reference to these definitions is included in the public comment form to make sure that those that only look at the form have the appropriate context.



Best regards,



Caitlin, Berry and Marika

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Becky Burr via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Reply to: Becky Burr <becky.burr at board.icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 15 June 2021 at 21:59
To: "Kapin, Laureen" <LKAPIN at ftc.gov>
Cc: "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question 5 to the Community - clarification needed

do you mean pseudonymized rather than anonymized?


On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kapin, Laureen via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>> wrote:
In preparing for tomorrow’s presentation, I realized that Question 5 to the Community omits an important word, “anonymized.” We should correct this.

Here is the Question from the Initial Report:

EPDP Team Question for Community Input #5
Does this guidance as written provide sufficient information and resources to Registrars and Registry Operators who wish to publish a registrant- or registration-based email address? If not, what is missing and why?

Taken literally, this might leave the impression that the Recommendation is to publish a standard email address.  In fact, our deliberations involved the publication of an anonymized (or more precisely, pseudonymized) email address.  I request that we correct this oversight both so that our intention is clear and so that the public comments solicited focus on the real topic to consider – whether to publish some form of an anonymized email address.

I propose that we publish a corrected version of the Initial Report that inserts the word “anonymized” prior to “registrant- or registration-based email address” to correct this oversight.


Kind regards,
Laureen Kapin

Acting Assistant Director
Division of Consumer Response and Operations
Bureau of Consumer Protection
Federal Trade Commission

_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20210615/52a85bd8/attachment.html>