[GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam] GNSO Report draft - Review deadline COB 1 April 2022

[Steve Crocker]

Sebastian, et al,

Thanks.  I've added my comments.  The main points are:

   1. The overarching statement that "[t]he most important data gap in the
   ODA is the unknown volume of use for the SSAD" is completely wrong.
   Rather, what's missing is what knowledge of what the requesters need and
   how to move toward a streamlined system that meets their needs
   without putting the contracted parties or ICANN at risk.

   2. The requirement that registrars review every request runs counter to
   the necessary goal of learning how to automate as much as possible.

   3. The history of requests and responses must be available for study in
   order to learn how to evolve the overall system.

   4. A two year test with six month intervals is not consistent with "A
   proof of concept ... is expected to be relatively easy and inexpensive to
   set up and implement."

Thanks,

Steve


On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:47 AM Sebastien at registry.godaddy
<Sebastien at registry.godaddy> wrote:

> Hello Team,
>
>
>
> As discussed on our call yesterday, we edited the report prepared for the
> GNSO, in line with our latest discussions.
>
> Please find it here
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m3dANwxKK_q8gk5OTBcANkPk-PkTOCMS/edit?pli=1
>
>
>
> We kindly ask you to review and comment it by COB tomorrow, Friday 1
> April, for us to meet our Council submission deadline on Monday.
> We currently have a call scheduled for Monday should we need
> clarifications on your inputs. We may cancel this call if the report is
> clear and agreed by tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Please note that we have left the idiom ‘proof of concept’ in the document
> because we used it in our previous verbal reports. I did note that the
> small team had requested to give it a proper name and referenced
> “Simplified Request System” as suggested by Sarah in the chat. I know
> Ticketing System has often been used, but I see this as a generic term for
> the type of tools we foresee using, rather than a specific name for this
> tool.
>
> With your approval, going forward we will use Simplified Request System in
> our communications.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to your comments on the Google doc.
>
>
>
> Kindly,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Sebastien Ducos*
>
> GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
>
> [image: signature_2929969775]
>
> +33612284445
>
> France & Australia
>
> sebastien at registry.godaddy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam mailing list
> GNSO-EPDPP2-SmallTeam at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdpp2-smallteam
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdpp2-smallteam/attachments/20220331/07daa9cc/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 44734 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdpp2-smallteam/attachments/20220331/07daa9cc/image001-0001.png>