[gnso-gac-closed-generics] Closed Generics Feedback Request - On Mailing List

[Manal Ismail]

Dear Melissa ..

Many thanks for your email ..
Please find my responses inline below in blue ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

From: gnso-gac-closed-generics <gnso-gac-closed-generics-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Melissa Peters Allgood
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 11:36 PM
To: gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-gac-closed-generics] Closed Generics Feedback Request - On Mailing List

Hi all,

In the interest of dedicating our call time to framework substance, I was hoping we could resolve a few outstanding matters on this mailing list. Please respond to each question.

Timeline (email and document from Mary Wong on 3 April attached)

  1.  Are there any objections?
No

  1.  Is anyone opposed to adding a call on 26 April?
     *   If you agree, this will give us 4 calls (12 April, 19 April, 24 April, and 26 April) to work through the strawman document and review the agreed framework outputs before sharing with the broader community.
No opposition to adding a call on 26 April

  1.  I can only make the first 45 minutes of the 19 April call, currently scheduled for 12:30 UTC. Are you opposed to another org staff member stepping in to complete that call?
     *   The alternative is to move the 19 April call to 20:00 UTC the same day and I will be present the entire time.
I’m flexible to join on 19 April at any of the proposed times, 12:30 UTC or 20:00 UTC

Increasing transparency
Assuming the group agrees upon a framework, once that work is shared with the broader community would you like to increase transparency into the work you’ve done? If so, options include:
Yes agree to increasing transparency

  1.  Open the wiki page, making call recordings and notes publicly available.
Not sure whether you mean onwards or retroactively .. Anyway I agree to open up onwards, and retroactively if everyone agrees

  1.  Allow observers to attend future calls, including the two sessions scheduled for ICANN77.
Agree

Please respond with your preferred approach.

Information to share with GNSO Council while you deliberate on substantive framework elements
In the interest of working in parallel with other groups, is there any objection to the following information being shared with GNSO Council while you deliberate on framework elements:

“To the extent this group agrees upon a framework, the expectation is that it will include types of things/information that will be requested of applicants to be included in the application, elements that will be evaluated in the application process, and protections following implementation, likely PICs. The dialogue group is also likely to provide a list of policy areas where the policy process needs to do further work to fill in gaps within the framework.”
Agree

Thank you for your continued dedication. The end is in sight.

Melissa

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230412/89864947/attachment.html>