[gnso-gac-closed-generics] Closed Generics Feedback Request - On Mailing List

[John McElwaine]

Melissa,

My answers:

Timeline:

  1.  No.
  2.  Not opposed.
  3.  Not opposed.

Increased Transparency:

  1.  Agree
  2.  Agree

Thanks,
John

From: gnso-gac-closed-generics <gnso-gac-closed-generics-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Melissa Peters Allgood
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 5:36 PM
To: gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-gac-closed-generics] Closed Generics Feedback Request - On Mailing List

◄External Email► - From: gnso-gac-closed-generics-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-gac-closed-generics-bounces at icann.org>

Hi all,

In the interest of dedicating our call time to framework substance, I was hoping we could resolve a few outstanding matters on this mailing list. Please respond to each question.

Timeline (email and document from Mary Wong on 3 April attached)

  1.  Are there any objections?
  2.  Is anyone opposed to adding a call on 26 April?
     *   If you agree, this will give us 4 calls (12 April, 19 April, 24 April, and 26 April) to work through the strawman document and review the agreed framework outputs before sharing with the broader community.
  3.  I can only make the first 45 minutes of the 19 April call, currently scheduled for 12:30 UTC. Are you opposed to another org staff member stepping in to complete that call?
     *   The alternative is to move the 19 April call to 20:00 UTC the same day and I will be present the entire time.

Increasing transparency
Assuming the group agrees upon a framework, once that work is shared with the broader community would you like to increase transparency into the work you’ve done? If so, options include:

  1.  Open the wiki page, making call recordings and notes publicly available.
  2.  Allow observers to attend future calls, including the two sessions scheduled for ICANN77.
Please respond with your preferred approach.

Information to share with GNSO Council while you deliberate on substantive framework elements
In the interest of working in parallel with other groups, is there any objection to the following information being shared with GNSO Council while you deliberate on framework elements:

“To the extent this group agrees upon a framework, the expectation is that it will include types of things/information that will be requested of applicants to be included in the application, elements that will be evaluated in the application process, and protections following implementation, likely PICs. The dialogue group is also likely to provide a list of policy areas where the policy process needs to do further work to fill in gaps within the framework.”


Thank you for your continued dedication. The end is in sight.

Melissa


Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230412/deff2b42/attachment-0001.html>