[gnso-gac-closed-generics] Closed Generics - Please Review and Respond
Nigel Hickson
nigel.hickson at dcms.gov.uk
Fri Jun 2 09:10:15 UTC 2023
Good morning
Totally agree with Jorge here; a clean text is best to take a view on;
Best
Nigel
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, 09:56 Jorge.Cancio--- via gnso-gac-closed-generics, <
gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org> wrote:
> Dear all
>
>
>
> I’m just going through the v4 text and I’m quite dismayed that -contrary
> to what has been instructed- some colleagues are directly editing the text
> instead of just making side-comments.
>
>
>
> @staff: please eliminate all editing done by people other than staff, so
> that we have a level playing field…
>
>
>
> Kindly
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *Von:* gnso-gac-closed-generics <
> gnso-gac-closed-generics-bounces at icann.org> *Im Auftrag von *Melissa
> Peters Allgood
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2023 20:37
> *An:* gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
> *Betreff:* [gnso-gac-closed-generics] Closed Generics - Please Review and
> Respond
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> First, I’d like to thank each of you for your hard work yesterday. Your
> willingness to hear one another and find a compromise was on full display.
> I recognize that many of you don’t love where your work landed, but you
> worked hard to find a path that all can live with. Truly the MSM at work.
>
>
>
> Below you will find our attempt to capture the agreement in principle that
> was reached.
>
>
>
> *Definitions* - Staff proposed agreement in principle based on 31 May
> call:
>
>
>
> - For purposes of the Facilitated Dialogue on Closed Generic gTLDs, it
> was necessary for the group to have a shared understanding of concepts
> relevant to closed generic gTLDs. Bearing in mind relevant definitions
> found in the Base gTLD Registry Agreement, Section 2.9(c) (“Affiliate”) and
> Specification 11, Section 3(d) (“Generic String”), the group agreed not to
> change any existing definitions, but acknowledged that there are likely
> other entities beyond “Affiliates” that would benefit from exclusive
> operation of a closed generic gTLD with the registry. A future policy group
> should consider incorporating this concept in its work.
> - For purposes of this discussion, the group views a “closed
> generic gTLD” as a “gTLD with exclusive registry access”, understood to be
> a gTLD string that is a generic word or term under which domains are
> registered exclusively by the registry operator, its affiliates, and
> possibly other relevant entities as determined by subsequent policy work.
>
>
>
> Please respond if you can live with this compromise. If you cannot, please
> offer a detailed way forward.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Public Comment* – staff proposed agreement in principle based on 31 May
> call:
>
>
>
> - Applications for closed generics gTLDs should be subject to the same
> Public Comment period as all other gTLD applications. However, given that
> closed generic gTLDs are uniquely impactful to the public interest, the
> group acknowledges there should be more time dedicated to their Public
> Comments if the number of these applications is considerable. If there are
> more than 10 closed generic gTLD applications, then the Public Comment
> period will be extended automatically for 60 days solely for closed generic
> gTLD application comments. This does not replace ICANN’s discretion to
> extend the Public Comment period for all applications, and the 60-day
> extension will apply to the full length of the Public Comment period
> (extended or otherwise).
> - In line with Implementation Guidance 13.6 from the New gTLD
> Subsequent Procedures Final Report
> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/final-report-newgtld-subsequent-procedures-pdp-02feb21-en.pdf>(pg.
> 244), this implementation should enable the public to easily identify and
> obtain information about applications for closed generic gTLDs. The group
> agrees that there must be a centralized space where prospective commenters
> can go to understand the rules for closed generic gTLDs and view the
> applications themselves.
> - Note: In arriving at this compromise approach to Public Comment,
> the group acknowledges the unique nature inherent to closed generic gTLDs,
> as well as the need for sufficient time for meaningful Public Comments, and
> the public’s need to readily find all relevant information about closed
> generic gTLD applications.
>
>
>
> Please respond if you can live with this compromise. If you cannot, please
> offer a detailed way forward.
>
>
>
>
>
> *To do:*
>
> 1. Respond to the proposed approach for Definition and Public Comment
> above
> 2. Review the Closed Generics Framework v4 document (s) – Edits Tracked
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nEy2mQm01ITo-ovxgIVQ0kNIpLqPV4bqVxTKgZb15vQ/edit>
> and/or Clean
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1InSBpBSW-j2aVwsk59t-Hs2LfAhuEKNfiwkFoi3SYxU/edit>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Agenda for 5 June 2023 at 12:30 UTC:*
>
> 1. Finalize Definition and Public Comment
> 2. Review preliminary framework (Closed Generics Framework v4)
> 3. Final call to determine if the group can live with the preliminary
> framework document (Items 1 & 2)
> 4. Discuss Closed Generics sessions at ICANN77
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As always, my sincere thanks for all your hard work.
>
>
>
> Melissa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Melissa Peters Allgood
>
> Conflict Resolution Specialist
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1 202 570 7240
>
> www.icann.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-gac-closed-generics mailing list
> gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-gac-closed-generics
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230602/c139b4e4/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-gac-closed-generics
mailing list