[gnso-gac-closed-generics] Draft Framework for Closed Generic gTLD & ICANN77 Sessions

[jeff at jjnsolutions.com]

Does it seem odd to anyone in this group that the framework is being 
presented by ICANN staff.  Does that send the right message that this 
was a facilitated dialog  amongst community members.

Also, I know this is a late question, but are we even sure that ICANN 
Org would support this type of framework and be able to implement it?

On that note, I would like to specifically make an ask to GDD staff that 
they specifically respond during the public comment period with their 
concerns or support or both.  We have learned that staff providing input 
AFTER the policies are developed is too late for any meaningful changes, 
and we do not want to repeat the unnecessary delays of having to have an 
ODP after all the work is done.

So, I am specifically proposing a note to both ICANN Org and the Board 
asking for their input during this meeting and during the brief comment 
period!

Who is with me on that?




------ Original Message ------
>From "Melissa Peters Allgood" <melissa.allgood at icann.org>
To "gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org" 
<gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org>
Date 6/8/2023 9:16:06 AM
Subject [gnso-gac-closed-generics] Draft Framework for Closed Generic 
gTLD & ICANN77 Sessions

>Hello all,
>
>
>
>Congratulations on a job well done! You have worked hard to reach this 
>point, a compromise draft framework ready for community for feedback. 
>Your dedication to this project is a testament to the multistakholder 
>model.
>
>
>
>Just a few points for your review following yesterday’s call.
>
>
>
>Draft Framework
>
>Attached is the Draft Framework for Closed Generic gTLDs. This document 
>will be shared with the community at 21:00 UTC today, 8 June. Please 
>note, all meeting notes taken pursuant to Chatham House rules are found 
>via link in Annex 2, as well as on the public wiki page for this group.
>
>
>
>ICANN77 Session Planning
>
>Based on your feedback (albeit brief) on our call, we propose the 
>following session structure for ICANN77:
>
>
>
>Section 1: Presentation of information – Staff
>
>Introduction to the Dialogue
>Introduction to the Process, Commitments & Participants
>Introduction to the Framework
>
>
>Section 2: Discussion and community questions – Participants
>
>
>
>Question: Do you wish to run the same structure at both sessions or do 
>you prefer two different sessions plans? If you select the latter, 
>please elaborate.
>
>
>
>
>
>Many thanks and heartfelt congratulations!
>
>Melissa
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230608/3ce88357/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xthj5fjh.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11989 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230608/3ce88357/xthj5fjh.png>